Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26865719›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2016

Potential To Streamline Heterologous DNA Prime and NYVAC/Protein Boost HIV Vaccine Regimens in Rhesus Macaques by Employing Improved Antigens.

Benedikt Asbach, Alexander Kliche, Josef Köstler, Beatriz Perdiguero, Mariano Esteban, Bertram L Jacobs, David C Montefiori, Celia C LaBranche, Nicole L Yates, Georgia D Tomaras and 22 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 18 institutions in 5 countries.

Benedikt AsbachInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Alexander KlicheInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Josef KöstlerInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Beatriz PerdigueroDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Mariano EstebanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Bertram L JacobsBiodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
David C MontefioriDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Celia C LaBrancheDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Nicole L YatesDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Georgia D TomarasDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Guido FerrariDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kathryn E FouldsVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mario RoedererVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Gary LanducciDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA.
Donald N ForthalDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA.
Michael S SeamanCenter for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Natalie HawkinsStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Steven G SelfStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Alicia SatoStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Raphael GottardoStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sanjay PhogatSanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania, USA.
James TartagliaSanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania, USA.
Susan W BarnettNovartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Brian BurkeNovartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Anthony D CristilloAdvanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Deborah E WeissAdvanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Jesse FrancisAdvanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Lindsey GalminAdvanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Song DingEuroVacc Foundation, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jonathan L HeeneyLab of Viral Zoonotics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Giuseppe PantaleoDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ralf WagnerInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany ralf.wagner@klinik.uni-regensburg.de.
Duke Medical Center · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USBioScience Laboratories (United States) · USUniversity of Regensburg · DENovartis (United States) · USSanofi (United States) · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USAdvanced Bioscience Laboratories (United States) · USArizona State University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCentro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESEurovacc Foundation · CHInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DENational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414PHS HHS HHSN266200500007C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIn a follow-up to the modest efficacy observed in the RV144 trial, researchers in the HIV vaccine field seek to substantiate and extend the results by evaluating other poxvirus vectors and combinations with DNA and protein vaccines. Earlier clinical trials (EuroVacc trials 01 to 03) evaluated the immunogenicity of HIV-1 clade C GagPolNef and gp120 antigens delivered via the poxviral vector NYVAC. These showed that a vaccination regimen including DNA-C priming prior to a NYVAC-C boost considerably enhanced vaccine-elicited immune responses compared to those with NYVAC-C alone. Moreover, responses were improved by using three as opposed to two DNA-C primes. In the present study, we assessed in nonhuman primates whether such vaccination regimens can be streamlined further by using fewer and accelerated immunizations and employing a novel generation of improved DNA-C and NYVAC-C vaccine candidates designed for higher expression levels and more balanced immune responses. Three different DNA-C prime/NYVAC-C+ protein boost vaccination regimens were tested in rhesus macaques. All regimens elicited vigorous and well-balanced CD8(+)and CD4(+)T cell responses that were broad and polyfunctional. Very high IgG binding titers, substantial antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and modest antibody-dependent cell-mediated virus inhibition (ADCVI), but very low neutralization activity, were measured after the final immunizations. Overall, immune responses elicited in all three groups were very similar and of greater magnitude, breadth, and quality than those of earlier EuroVacc vaccines. In conclusion, these findings indicate that vaccination schemes can be simplified by using improved antigens and regimens. This may offer a more practical and affordable means to elicit potentially protective immune responses upon vaccination, especially in resource-constrained settings. IMPORTANCE: Within the EuroVacc clinical trials, we previously assessed the immunogenicity of HIV clade C antigens delivered in a DNA prime/NYVAC boost regimen. The trials showed that the DNA prime crucially improved the responses, and three DNA primes with a NYVAC boost appeared to be optimal. Nevertheless, T cell responses were primarily directed toward Env, and humoral responses were modest. The aim of this study was to assess improved antigens for the capacity to elicit more potent and balanced responses in rhesus macaques, even with various simpler immunization regimens. Our results showed that the novel antigens in fact elicited larger numbers of T cells with a polyfunctional profile and a good Env-GagPolNef balance, as well as high-titer and Fc-functional antibody responses. Finally, comparison of the different schedules indicates that a simpler regimen of only two DNA primes and one NYVAC boost in combination with protein may be very efficient, thus showing that the novel antigens allow for easier immunization protocols.

Indexed as

DNA PrimersAIDS VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicitygag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensInterferon-gammaMaleT-LymphocytesVaccinationVaccines, DNAAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingDNA Primersgag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusHIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensInterferon-gammaNYVAC-C vaccineVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26865719
PMCPMC4810551
OpenAlexW2320777742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.