Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26865669›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2016

Moving Toward Integrating Gene Expression Profiling Into High-Throughput Testing: A Gene Expression Biomarker Accurately Predicts Estrogen Receptor α Modulation in a Microarray Compendium.

Natalia Ryan, Brian Chorley, Raymond R Tice, Richard Judson, J Christopher Corton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Signature analysis of high-throughput transcriptomics screening data for mechanistic inference and chemical grouping.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Commentary: Novel strategies and new tools to curtail the health effects of pesticides.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2021
    Article
  13. High-Throughput Transcriptomics Platform for Screening Environmental Chemicals.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Set of Six Gene Expression Biomarkers Identify Rat Liver Tumorigens in Short-term Assays.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia Ryan*Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Integrated Systems Toxicology Division, US-EPA.
Brian ChorleyIntegrated Systems Toxicology Division, US-EPA.
Raymond R TiceDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Richard JudsonNational Center for Computational Toxicology, US-EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
J Christopher CortonIntegrated Systems Toxicology Division, US-EPA corton.chris@epa.gov.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

Biomolecular Screening and Alternative Approaches for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103318 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CASEY, WARREN · 2016 to 2021
$25.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microarray profiling of chemical-induced effects is being increasingly used in medium- and high-throughput formats. Computational methods are described here to identify molecular targets from whole-genome microarray data using as an example the estrogen receptor α (ERα), often modulated by potential endocrine disrupting chemicals. ERα biomarker genes were identified by their consistent expression after exposure to 7 structurally diverse ERα agonists and 3 ERα antagonists in ERα-positive MCF-7 cells. Most of the biomarker genes were shown to be directly regulated by ERα as determined by ESR1 gene knockdown using siRNA as well as through chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with DNA sequencing analysis of ERα-DNA interactions. The biomarker was evaluated as a predictive tool using the fold-change rank-based Running Fisher algorithm by comparison to annotated gene expression datasets from experiments using MCF-7 cells, including those evaluating the transcriptional effects of hormones and chemicals. Using 141 comparisons from chemical- and hormone-treated cells, the biomarker gave a balanced accuracy for prediction of ERα activation or suppression of 94% and 93%, respectively. The biomarker was able to correctly classify 18 out of 21 (86%) ER reference chemicals including "very weak" agonists. Importantly, the biomarker predictions accurately replicated predictions based on 18 in vitro high-throughput screening assays that queried different steps in ERα signaling. For 114 chemicals, the balanced accuracies were 95% and 98% for activation or suppression, respectively. These results demonstrate that the ERα gene expression biomarker can accurately identify ERα modulators in large collections of microarray data derived from MCF-7 cells.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticEndocrine DisruptorsEstrogen AntagonistsEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogensFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMCF-7 CellsRNA InterferenceEndocrine DisruptorsESR1 protein, humanEstrogen AntagonistsEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogensbiomarker.estrogen receptorgene expression profilingMCF-7 cell line

Identifiers

PMID26865669
PMCPMC4900138
OpenAlexW2264803696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.