ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016
Mind the Gap: Two Dissociable Mechanisms of Temporal Processing in the Auditory System.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Best practices in neurotoxicology research must account for spontaneous brain malformations in rodent models.Neurotoxicology · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- The what, which, when, why and who of Off responses in the auditory system.The Journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Characterization of Auditory Responsive Neurons in the Mouse Superior Colliculus to White Noise and Frequency-Restricted Sounds.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Parvalbumin neurons and cortical coding of dynamic stimuli: a network model.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- A general model unifying the adaptive, transient and sustained properties of ON and OFF auditory neural responses.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Sex differences during development in cortical temporal processing and event related potentials in wild-type and fragile X syndrome model mice.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2024Article
- Obliteration of a glycinergic projection to the medial geniculate in an animal model of autism.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Article
- Developmental delays in cortical auditory temporal processing in a mouse model of Fragile X syndrome.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2023Article
- Binaural advantages in sound temporal information processing by neurons in the rat inferior colliculus.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Leveling up: a long-range olivary projection to the medial geniculate without collaterals to the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus in rats.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Offset Responses in the Auditory Cortex Show Unique History Dependence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- More than the end: OFF response plasticity as a mnemonic signature of a sound's behavioral salience.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Lemniscal Corticothalamic Feedback in Auditory Scene Analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Listening in complex acoustic scenes.Current opinion in physiology · 2020Article
- A role of oligodendrocytes in information processing.Nature communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
High temporal acuity of auditory processing underlies perception of speech and other rapidly varying sounds. A common measure of auditory temporal acuity in humans is the threshold for detection of brief gaps in noise. Gap-detection deficits, observed in developmental disorders, are considered evidence for "sluggish" auditory processing. Here we show, in a mouse model of gap-detection deficits, that auditory brain sensitivity to brief gaps in noise can be impaired even without a general loss of central auditory temporal acuity. Extracellular recordings in three different subdivisions of the auditory thalamus in anesthetized mice revealed a stimulus-specific, subdivision-specific deficit in thalamic sensitivity to brief gaps in noise in experimental animals relative to controls. Neural responses to brief gaps in noise were reduced, but responses to other rapidly changing stimuli unaffected, in lemniscal and nonlemniscal (but not polysensory) subdivisions of the medial geniculate body. Through experiments and modeling, we demonstrate that the observed deficits in thalamic sensitivity to brief gaps in noise arise from reduced neural population activity following noise offsets, but not onsets. These results reveal dissociable sound-onset-sensitive and sound-offset-sensitive channels underlying auditory temporal processing, and suggest that gap-detection deficits can arise from specific impairment of the sound-offset-sensitive channel. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The experimental and modeling results reported here suggest a new hypothesis regarding the mechanisms of temporal processing in the auditory system. Using a mouse model of auditory temporal processing deficits, we demonstrate the existence of specific abnormalities in auditory thalamic activity following sound offsets, but not sound onsets. These results reveal dissociable sound-onset-sensitive and sound-offset-sensitive mechanisms underlying auditory processing of temporally varying sounds. Furthermore, the findings suggest that auditory temporal processing deficits, such as impairments in gap-in-noise detection, could arise from reduced brain sensitivity to sound offsets alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.