Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26865612›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Opposing Roles of Cholinergic and GABAergic Activity in the Insular Cortex and Nucleus Basalis Magnocellularis during Novel Recognition and Familiar Taste Memory Retrieval.

Gabriela Rodríguez-García, María Isabel Miranda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Basolateral amygdala activation enhances object recognition memory by inhibiting anterior insular cortex activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dopamine-Dependent QR2 Pathway Activation in CA1 Interneurons Enhances Novel Memory Formation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. Taste Processing: Insights from Animal Models.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. The Insula and Taste Learning.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriela Rodríguez-GarcíaDepartamento de Neurobiología Conductual y Cognitiva, Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 76230 Querétaro, México.
María Isabel MirandaDepartamento de Neurobiología Conductual y Cognitiva, Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 76230 Querétaro, México mirandami@unam.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1823-2152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetylcholine (ACh) is thought to facilitate cortical plasticity during memory formation and its release is regulated by the nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM). Questions remain regarding which neuronal circuits and neurotransmitters trigger activation or suppression of cortical cholinergic activity. During novel, but not familiar, taste consumption, there is a significant increase in ACh release in the insular cortex (IC), a highly relevant structure for taste learning. Here, we evaluate how GABA inhibition modulates cholinergic transmission and its involvement during taste novelty processing and familiar taste memory retrieval. Using saccharin as a taste stimulus in a taste preference paradigm, we examined the effects of injecting the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol or the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline into the IC or NBM during learning or retrieval of an appetitive taste memory on taste preference in male Sprague Dawley rats. GABAA receptor agonism and antagonism had opposite effects on cortical ACh levels in novel taste presentation versus familiar taste recognition and ACh levels were associated with the propensity to acquire or retrieve a taste memory. These results indicate that the pattern of cortical cholinergic and GABAergic neuroactivity during novel taste exposure is the opposite of that which occurs during familiar taste recognition and these differing neurotransmitter system states may enable different behavioral consequences. Divergences in ACh and GABA levels may produce differential alterations in excitatory and inhibitory neural processes within the cortex during acquisition and retrieval. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: During learning and recall, several brain structures act together. This work demonstrates interactions between cortical cholinergic and GABAergic systems during taste learning and memory retrieval. We found that the neuroactivity pattern during novel taste exposure is opposite that which occurs during familiar taste recognition. GABAA receptors must be inactive during novel tasting to enable new memory formation, but must be active and inhibiting acetylcholine release in the cortex to allow memory retrieval. These findings indicate that GABA inhibition modulates cholinergic transmission and that cholinergic-GABAergic system interactions are important during the transition from novel to familiar memory.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsBasal Nucleus of MeynertBicucullineCerebral CortexDrinking BehaviorGABA AgonistsGABA Antagonistsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidMaleMental RecallMuscimolParasympathetic Nervous SystemRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, GABA-AAcetylcholineBicucullineGABA AgonistsGABA Antagonistsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidMuscimolReceptors, GABA-AappetitiveGABA receptorsmicrodialysispharmacologytaste preference

Identifiers

PMID26865612
PMCPMC6602015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.