Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26865424›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2016

Neural correlates of prosocial peer influence on public goods game donations during adolescence.

Jorien Van Hoorn, Eric Van Dijk, Berna Güroğlu, Eveline A Crone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Human Prosocial Preferences Are Related to Slow-Wave Activity in Sleep.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Distinctive Roles of Medial Prefrontal Cortex Subregions in Strategic Conformity to Social Hierarchy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Longitudinal self-concept development in adolescence.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jorien Van HoornDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, the Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, the Netherlands and j.van.hoorn@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
Eric Van DijkLeiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, the Netherlands and Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, the Netherlands.
Berna GüroğluDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, the Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, the Netherlands and.
Eveline A CroneDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, the Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, the Netherlands and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A unique feature of adolescent social re-orientation is heightened sensitivity to peer influence when taking risks. However, positive peer influence effects are not yet well understood. The present fMRI study tested a novel hypothesis, by examining neural correlates of prosocial peer influence on donation decisions in adolescence. Participants (age 12-16 years; N = 61) made decisions in anonymous groups about the allocation of tokens between themselves and the group in a public goods game. Two spectator groups of same-age peers-in fact youth actors-were allegedly online during some of the decisions. The task had a within-subjects design with three conditions: (1) EVALUATION: spectators evaluated decisions with likes for large donations to the group, (2) Spectator: spectators were present but no evaluative feedback was displayed and (3) Alone: no spectators nor feedback. Results showed that prosocial behavior increased in the presence of peers, and even more when participants received evaluative feedback from peers. Peer presence resulted in enhanced activity in several social brain regions including medial prefrontal cortex, temporal parietal junction (TPJ), precuneus and superior temporal sulcus. TPJ activity correlated with donations, which suggests similar networks for prosocial behavior and sensitivity to peers. These findings highlight the importance of peers in fostering prosocial development throughout adolescence.

Indexed as

Peer InfluenceSocial BehaviorAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorBrain MappingCerebral CortexChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleadolescencepeer influenceprosocial behaviorsocial brain network

Identifiers

PMID26865424
PMCPMC4884312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.