Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26865188›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2016

Total hip arthroplasty via the anterior approach: tips and tricks for primary and revision surgery.

Philip J York, Charles T Smarck, Thierry Judet, Cyril Mauffrey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness of staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty via different approaches].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2017
    Article
  14. [Short-term effectiveness analysis of one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2017
    Article
  15. [Comparative study on differences in acetabular position during total hip arthroplasty between by direct anterior approach and by posterolateral approach].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philip J YorkUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Charles T SmarckNaval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Thierry JudetHôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France.
Cyril MauffreyDepartment of Orthopedics, Denver Health Medical Center, 777 Bannock St., MC 0188, Denver, CO, 80204, USA. cmauffrey@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDescribed for the first time in the 1950s, the direct anterior approach to the hip has been gaining in popularity over the last decade following the trend of minimally invasive surgery. This paper provides an overview of the approach and its indications and various uses and focuses on its utility in the revision setting. A detailed overview of the technique including tips and tricks as well as an explanation of common errors are included.

methodGraphic and clinical study of the approach, indications and feasibility.

resultsThe reported benefits of the direct anterior technique include enhanced post-operative recovery and respect for all the innervation and vascularization territories. It has been shown to be safe and effective in revision settings, to decrease the occurrence of heterotopic ossification, to enhance the accuracy of acetabular cup positioning, and to improve post-operative rehabilitation while having comparable outcomes in terms of loosening or component failure. Additionally, thromboembolic events have been shown to be decreased compared to other approaches. The most common reported complications in the revision setting is intra-operative fracture. The decision of a surgeon to transition to this approach, however, comes with a learning curve and potentially detrimental complications if done improperly. DISCUSSION: In addition to its appeal in the primary setting, the approach could possibly be a solution to decrease the morbidity associated with revision surgery through its use of a fresh tissue plane not previously traumatized with the primary approach.

Indexed as

ReoperationArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFractures, BoneHip JointHumansPatient PositioningPostoperative PeriodProsthesis FailureAnterior hip replacementDirect anterior hipSurgical techniqueTHA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.