Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26865070›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Contrasting Patterns of Evolutionary Diversification in the Olfactory Repertoires of Reptile and Bird Genomes.

Michael W Vandewege, Sarah F Mangum, Toni Gabaldón, Todd A Castoe, David A Ray, Federico G Hoffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cross-species applicability of an adverse outcome pathway network for thyroid hormone system disruption.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Divergent sensory and immune gene evolution in sea turtles with contrasting demographic and life histories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Olfactory receptor repertoire size in dinosaurs.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  19. Expansion of vomeronasal receptor genes (Communications biology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael W VandewegeDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University.
Sarah F MangumDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University.
Toni GabaldónBioinformatics and Genomics Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, Spain Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain Institució Catalana de Recerca I Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.
Todd A CastoeDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington.
David A RayDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University.
Federico G HoffmannDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biochemistry, Mississippi State University federico.g.hoffmann@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory receptors (ORs) are membrane proteins that mediate the detection of odorants in the environment, and are the largest vertebrate gene family. Comparative studies of mammalian genomes indicate that OR repertoires vary widely, even between closely related lineages, as a consequence of frequent OR gains and losses. Several studies also suggest that mammalian OR repertoires are influenced by life history traits. Sauropsida is a diverse group of vertebrates group that is the sister group to mammals, and includes birds, testudines, squamates, and crocodilians, and represents a natural system to explore predictions derived from mammalian studies. In this study, we analyzed olfactory receptor (OR) repertoire variation among several representative species and found that the number of intact OR genes in sauropsid genomes analyzed ranged over an order of magnitude, from 108 in the green anole to over 1,000 in turtles. Our results suggest that different sauropsid lineages have highly divergent OR repertoire composition that derive from lineage-specific combinations of gene expansions, losses, and retentions of ancestral OR genes. These differences also suggest that varying degrees of adaption related to life history have shaped the unique OR repertoires observed across sauropsid lineages.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAlligators and CrocodilesAnimalsBirdsLizardsMammalsOdorantsReceptors, OdorantSpecies SpecificityTurtlesReceptors, Odorantgene duplicationgene family evolutionORsSauropsida

Identifiers

PMID26865070
PMCPMC4825420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.