ArticleHepatology international2016
Association of adiponectin gene polymorphisms and additional gene-gene interaction with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the Chinese Han population.
Article in Hepatology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation of Adiponectin Gene PolymorphismsFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- Association between ADIPOQ G276T and C11377G polymorphisms and the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: An updated meta-analysis.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Correlation Between Adiponectin Gene rs1501299 Polymorphism and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Susceptibility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the association between the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the adiponectin gene and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as well as the impact of the interaction of multiple SNPs on NAFLD risk, based on a Chinese population study.
methodsA total of 612 subjects (411 male, 201 female) were selected, including 302 NAFLD patients and 310 controls. Three SNPs were selected for genotyping in the case-control study: rs266729, rs822393, and rs1501299. A logistic regression model was used to examine the interaction between the SNPs and NAFLD. The odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were calculated. Generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction (GMDR) was employed to analyze the interaction among SNPs.
resultsLogistic analysis showed a significant association between genotypes of variants in rs266729 and rs822393 and increased NAFLD risk. The carriers of the homozygous mutant of two SNP polymorphisms revealed increased NAFLD risk compared to those with wild-type homozygotes; ORs (95 % CI) were 1.31 (1.14-1.81) (p = 0.001) and 1.18 (1.05-1.71) (p = 0.005), respectively. There was a significant two-locus model (p = 0.0010) involving rs266729 and rs822393, indicating a potential gene-gene interaction between rs266729 and rs822393. Overall, the two-locus models had a cross-validation consistency of 10 and testing accuracy of 62.17 %. Subjects with the CG or GG and CT or TT genotype have the highest NAFLD risk compared to subjects with the CC-CC genotype; the OR (95 % CI) was 2.52 (1.31-3.82), p < 0.001, after covariate adjustment.
conclusionsOur results support an important association of the rs266729 (-11377 G/C) and rs822393 (-4522 C/T) polymorphism with increased risk of NAFLD. The interaction analysis showed a combined effect of rs266729 and rs822393 on NAFLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.