Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26865042›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2016

Lack of association between polymorphisms in the CYP1A2 gene and risk of cancer: evidence from meta-analyses.

Vladimir Vukovic, Carolina Ianuale, Emanuele Leoncini, Roberta Pastorino, Maria Rosaria Gualano, Rosarita Amore, Stefania Boccia

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. In vitro analysis of factors influencingPharmacology research & perspectives · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vladimir VukovicInstitute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy. vladimir.vukovic@rm.unicatt.it.
Carolina IanualeInstitute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Emanuele LeonciniInstitute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Roberta PastorinoInstitute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Maria Rosaria GualanoInstitute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Rosarita AmoreInstitute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Stefania BocciaInstitute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolymorphisms in the CYP1A2 genes have the potential to affect the individual capacity to convert pre-carcinogens into carcinogens. With these comprehensive meta-analyses, we aimed to provide a quantitative assessment of the association between the published genetic association studies on CYP1A2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the risk of cancer.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science and SCOPUS bibliographic online databases and databases of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). After data extraction, we calculated Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between the retrieved CYP1A2 SNPs and cancer. Random effect model was used to calculate the pooled ORs. Begg and Egger tests, one-way sensitivity analysis were performed, when appropriate. We conducted stratified analyses by study design, sample size, ethnicity and tumour site.

resultsSeventy case-control studies and one GWA study detailing on six different SNPs were included. Among the 71 included studies, 42 were population-based case-control studies, 28 hospital-based case-control studies and one genome-wide association study, including total of 47,413 cancer cases and 58,546 controls. The meta-analysis of 62 studies on rs762551, reported an OR of 1.03 (95% CI, 0.96-1.12) for overall cancer (P for heterogeneity < 0.01; I(2) = 50.4%). When stratifying for tumour site, an OR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-1.01; P for heterogeneity = 0.23, I(2) = 28.5%) was reported for bladder cancer for those homozygous mutant of rs762551. An OR of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.65-0.95; P for heterogeneity = 0.09, I(2) = 58.1%) was obtained for the bladder cancer from the hospital-based studies and on Caucasians.

conclusionsThis large meta-analysis suggests no significant effect of the investigated CYP1A2 SNPs on cancer overall risk under various genetic models. However, when stratifying according to the tumour site, our results showed a borderline not significant OR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-1.01) for bladder cancer for those homozygous mutant of rs762551. Due to the limitations of our meta-analyses, the results should be interpreted with attention and need to be further confirmed by high-quality studies, for all the potential CYP1A2 SNPs.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2Genome-Wide Association StudyHumansNeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsWhite PeopleCYP1A2 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2

Identifiers

PMID26865042
PMCPMC4750358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.