Is labor-onset hypertension a novel category among hypertensive disorders of pregnancy associated with adverse events in high-risk subjects? Lights and shadows.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Norepinephrine or Phenylephrine to Prevent Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension During Cesarean Section: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study of Fetal Cerebral Perfusion.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
   Trial
2. A Study to Assess the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Labor-Onset Hypertension among Women in Intranatal Period Admitted in Selected Hospital, Assam.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The risk factors for labor onset hypertension.2016

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as