Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26864855›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2016

The Alpha-defensin Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infections Is Not Affected by Prior Antibiotic Administration.

Alisina Shahi, Javad Parvizi, Gregory S Kazarian, Carlos Higuera, Salvatore Frangiamore, Joshua Bingham, Christopher Beauchamp, Craig Della Valle, Carl Deirmengian

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CRISPR-based next-generation molecular diagnostics for bone infection.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Alisina ShahiThe Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Javad ParviziThe Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gregory S KazarianThe Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Carlos HigueraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Salvatore FrangiamoreDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Joshua BinghamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Christopher BeauchampDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Craig Della ValleDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Carl DeirmengianThe Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USRothman Institute · USLankenau Institute for Medical Research · USMayo Clinic Hospital · USPhoenix (United States) · USRush University Medical Center · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated that the administration of antibiotics to patients before performing diagnostic testing for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can interfere with the accuracy of test results. Although a single-institution study has suggested that alpha-defensin maintains its concentration and sensitivity even after antibiotic treatment, this has not yet been demonstrated in a larger multiinstitutional study. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) For the evaluation of PJI, is prior antibiotic administration associated with decreased alpha-defensin levels? (2) When prior antibiotics are given, is alpha-defensin a better screening test for PJI than the traditional tests (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], C-reactive protein [CRP], fluid white blood cells, fluid polymorphonuclear cells [PMNs], and fluid culture)?

methodsThis retrospective study included data from 106 hip and knee arthroplasties with Musculoskeletal Infection Society-defined PJI from four centers. Of the 106 patients in this study, 30 (28%) were treated with antibiotics for PJI before diagnostic workup (ABX group), and 76 (72%) were not treated before the diagnostic workup (NO-ABX group). There were no differences in age, sex, joint, culture-negative rate, or bacteriology between groups. The patients in the ABX group had antibiotics initiated by physicians who commenced care before assessment for PJI by the treating surgeon's service. We compared the alpha-defensin levels and sensitivity between the ABX and NO-ABX groups. Additionally, the sensitivity of the alpha-defensin test was compared to that of traditional tests for PJI among patients on antibiotics.

resultsThe administration of antibiotics before performing the alpha-defensin test for PJI was not associated with a decreased median alpha-defensin level (ABX group, median 4.2 [range, 1.79-12.8 S/CO] versus NO-ABX, median 4.9 [range, 0.5-16.8 S/CO], difference of medians: 0.68 S/CO [95% confidence interval {CI}, -0.98 to 1.26], p = 0.451). Furthermore, the alpha-defensin test had a higher sensitivity (100%; 95% CI, 88.4%-100.0%) in diagnosing PJI among patients on antibiotics when compared with the ESR (69.0% [95% CI, 49.17%-84.72%], p = 0.001), the CRP (79.3% [95% CI, 60.3%-92.0%], p = 0.009), the fluid PMN% (79.3% [95% CI, 60.3%-92.0%), p = 0.009), and fluid culture (70.0% [95% CI, 50.6%-85.3%], p = 0.001).

conclusionsThe alpha-defensin test maintains its concentration and sensitivity for PJI even in the setting of antibiotic administration. Furthermore, among patients with PJI on antibiotics, the alpha-defensin tests demonstrated a higher sensitivity in detecting PJI when compared with the ESR, CRP, fluid PMN%, and fluid culture. The high sensitivity of the alpha-defensin test, even in the setting of prior antibiotic treatment, provides excellent utility as a screening test for PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overalpha-DefensinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomarkersCross InfectionDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHip ProsthesisHumansKnee ProsthesisMalealpha-DefensinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID26864855
PMCPMC4887359
OpenAlexW2264515368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.