Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26864769›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Neural control of visual search by frontal eye field: chronometry of neural events and race model processes.

Matthew J Nelson, Aditya Murthy, Jeffrey D Schall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neurons in FEF Keep Track of Items That Have Been Previously Fixated in Free Viewing Visual Search.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Suppression of frontal eye field neuronal responses with maintained fixation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  7. Models of inhibitory control.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  8. Cortical control and performance monitoring of interrupting and redirecting movements.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew J NelsonDepartment of Psychology, Center for Integrative & Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee; California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California; and.
Aditya MurthyCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Jeffrey D SchallDepartment of Psychology, Center for Integrative & Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee; jeffrey.d.schall@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Kevin L Schey · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
SACCADE TARGET SELECTION-FRONTAL CORTEXR01EY008890 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WOODMAN, GEOFFREY F · 1991 to 2018
$7.4M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HARRELL, FRANK E. · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30-EY-08126NEI NIH HHS R01-EY-8890NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the chronometry of neural processes in frontal eye fields of macaques performing double-step saccade visual search in which a conspicuous target changes location in the array on a random fraction of trials. Durations of computational processes producing a saccade to original and final target locations (GO1 and GO2, respectively) are derived from response times (RT) on different types of trials. In these data, GO2 tended to be faster than GO1, demonstrating that inhibition of the initial saccade did not delay production of the compensated saccade. Here, we measured the dynamics of visual, visuomovement, and movement neuron activity in relation to these processes by examining trials when neurons instantiated either process. First, we verified that saccades were initiated when the discharge rate of movement neurons reached a threshold that was invariant across RT and trial type. Second, the time when visual and visuomovement neurons selected the target and when movement neuron activity began to accumulate were not significantly different across trial type. Third, the interval from the beginning of accumulation to threshold of movement-related activity was significantly shorter when instantiating the GO2 relative to the GO1 process. Differences observed between monkeys are discussed. Fourth, random variation of RT was accounted for to some extent by random variation in both the onset and duration of selective activity of each neuron type but mostly by variation of movement neuron accumulation duration. These findings offer new insights into the sources of control of target selection and saccade production in dynamic environments.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, VisualReaction TimeSaccadesVisual FieldsAnimalsFrontal LobeMacaca mulattaMacaca radiataNeuronsdecision makingdiffusion modellinking hypothesislinking propositionperceptual decision

Identifiers

PMID26864769
PMCPMC4869503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.