ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016
Whisker-related afferents in superior colliculus.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Somatosensory cortex shapes perceptual decision bias via the superior colliculus.Research square · 2026Article
- Article
- Stimulus selection enhances value-modulated somatosensory processing in the superior colliculus.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Separation of bimodal fMRI responses in mouse somatosensory areas into V1 and non-V1 contributions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Neural mechanisms for the localization of unexpected external motion.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Neurocircuitry of Predatory Hunting.Neuroscience bulletin · 2023Review
- Monosynaptic trans-collicular pathways link mouse whisker circuits to integrate somatosensory and motor cortical signals.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- The Orienting Reflex Reveals Behavioral States Set by Demanding Contexts: Role of the Superior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Predictability alters multisensory responses by modulating unisensory inputs.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Neural circuit control of innate behaviors.Science China. Life sciences · 2022Review
- Article
- Characterization of brain-wide somatosensory BOLD fMRI in mice under dexmedetomidine/isoflurane and ketamine/xylazine.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Superior colliculus modulates cortical coding of somatosensory information.Nature communications · 2020Article
- A Descending Circuit Derived From the Superior Colliculus Modulates Vibrissal Movements.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2018Article
- Circuits in the rodent brainstem that control whisking in concert with other orofacial motor actions.Neuroscience · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Rodents use their whiskers to explore the environment, and the superior colliculus is part of the neural circuits that process this sensorimotor information. Cells in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus integrate trigeminotectal afferents from trigeminal complex and corticotectal afferents from barrel cortex. Using histological methods in mice, we found that trigeminotectal and corticotectal synapses overlap somewhat as they innervate the lower and upper portions of the intermediate granular layer, respectively. Using electrophysiological recordings and optogenetics in anesthetized mice in vivo, we showed that, similar to rats, whisker deflections produce two successive responses that are driven by trigeminotectal and corticotectal afferents. We then employed in vivo and slice experiments to characterize the response properties of these afferents. In vivo, corticotectal responses triggered by electrical stimulation of the barrel cortex evoke activity in the superior colliculus that increases with stimulus intensity and depresses with increasing frequency. In slices from adult mice, optogenetic activation of channelrhodopsin-expressing trigeminotectal and corticotectal fibers revealed that cells in the intermediate layers receive more efficacious trigeminotectal, than corticotectal, synaptic inputs. Moreover, the efficacy of trigeminotectal inputs depresses more strongly with increasing frequency than that of corticotectal inputs. The intermediate layers of superior colliculus appear to be tuned to process strong but infrequent trigeminal inputs and weak but more persistent cortical inputs, which explains features of sensory responsiveness, such as the robust rapid sensory adaptation of whisker responses in the superior colliculus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.