Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26864594›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2016

The use of brief post-surgical low frequency electrical stimulation to enhance nerve regeneration in clinical practice.

K M Chan, M W T Curran, T Gordon

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03205124 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Pre-operative And/or Post-operative Electrical Stimulation on Enhancing Regeneration of Peripheral Sensory Nerve Regeneration in Human Hand, a Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2017 to 2023Enrolled38ConditionsPeripheral Nerve Injuries, Sensory Deficit, Digital Nerve LesionArmsElectrical Stimulation, Sham Stimulation
NCT03240900 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Electrical Stimulation for Improving Postoperative Breast Sensation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2027 to 2028Enrolled30ConditionsMammaplastyArmsElectrical Stimulation, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A review of new developments in peripheral nerve regeneration.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K M ChanDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
M W T CurranDivision of Plastic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
T GordonPlastic Surgery, Toronto Sick Children Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

CIHR RMF82496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite efforts to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration, there has been little progress in improving clinical outcomes. Recently, a method of brief post-surgical low frequency electrical stimulation of surgically repaired nerves has been developed. It was shown to accelerate axon outgrowth across the repair site and it hastened target reinnervation. In this brief review, we describe the mechanistic insights and functional impacts of the post-surgical electrical stimulation that have been gained through animal studies. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor, cyclic AMP and regeneration-associated genes play a vital role in expediting the outgrowth of axons across the injury site. The method of stimulation has also been shown to be effective in patients with severe compressive neuropathy as well as those with digital nerve laceration. Its clinical feasibility and positive impact open the door of further clinical translation in other peripheral nerve injuries.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyNerve RegenerationAnimalsElectric StimulationHumansPeripheral Nerve Injuries

Identifiers

PMID26864594
PMCPMC4929315
OpenAlexW2355970263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.