ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2016
Petrol exposure and DNA integrity of peripheral lymphocytes.
Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemical Biomarkers of Exposure and Early Damage from Potentially Carcinogenic Airborne Pollutants.Annals of cancer epidemiology · 2019Article
- Review
- Buccal micronucleus assay in human populations from Sicily (Italy) exposed to petrochemical industry pollutants.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Article
- Primary DNA Damage in Dry Cleaners with Perchlorethylene Exposure.The international journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the effect of petrol exposure on DNA integrity in peripheral blood lymphocytes among petrol attendants and a non-exposed comparison population.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 101 fuel station employees and 50 office-based non-exposed workers in Durban, South Africa. Participants were interviewed using a validated questionnaire. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral lymphocytes for the benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE)-DNA adduct assay (ELISA), and DNA damage was determined using the comet assay and reported as percentage tail DNA.
resultsThe exposed (n = 101) and non-exposed participants (n = 50) varied with regard to age, housing, smoking, and proximity to industry and petrol stations. Among the exposed, the mean duration of employment in the fuel industry was 5.8 years (SD = 4.6), and among those pumping fuel (n = 75), the mean metric tons of petrol pumped in the past 12 months per worker was 199.2 (SD = 88.9). The mean percentage tail DNA varied significantly between exposed and non-exposed groups: 23.8 % (SD = 13.3) and 8.1 % (SD = 1.8) (p < 0.01), respectively. A significant difference existed between the groups for BPDE-DNA adducts: 30.0 ng/ml (SD = 12.7) and 18.1 ng/ml (SD = 18.2) (p < 0.0001), respectively. Regression models, adjusting for cigarette smoking, age, and sex, showed a 16.5 greater percentage tail DNA among the exposed compared to non-exposed (95 % CI 11.8-21.1 %), while the exposed group had a 12.9 ng/ml greater increase in BPDE-DNA adducts has compared to the unexposed (95 % CI 7.2-18.7 ng/ml). Cigarette smoking resulted in almost a 3.5 % increase in percentage tail DNA.
conclusionOur study adds to the literature that long-term, low-dose exposure to vehicular fuels is likely to result in altered DNA integrity and genotoxicity among petrol attendants. These results strengthen the case that these workers must be afforded appropriate protection to prevent serious adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.