Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26864521›Full record

ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2016

An online method for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in electronic cigarette aerosol based on proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry.

Kostiantyn Breiev, Kerstin M M Burseg, Grant O'Connell, Eugen Hartungen, Stefan S Biel, Xavier Cahours, Stéphane Colard, Tilmann D Märk, Philipp Sulzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Chemical Characterization of Nanoparticles and Volatiles Present in Mainstream Hookah Smoke.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kostiantyn BreievIONICON Analytik GmbH, Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 3, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Kerstin M M BursegFontem Ventures B.V., Barbara Strozzilaan 101, 1083 HN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Grant O'ConnellFontem Ventures B.V., Barbara Strozzilaan 101, 1083 HN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eugen HartungenIONICON Analytik GmbH, Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 3, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefan S BielFontem Ventures B.V., Barbara Strozzilaan 101, 1083 HN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Xavier CahoursSEITA - Imperial Tobacco Group, 48 rue Danton, 45404, Fleury-les-Aubrais, France.
Stéphane ColardSEITA - Imperial Tobacco Group, 48 rue Danton, 45404, Fleury-les-Aubrais, France.
Tilmann D MärkIONICON Analytik GmbH, Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 3, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Philipp SulzerIONICON Analytik GmbH, Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 3, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDue to the recent rapid increase in electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use worldwide, there is a strong scientific but also practical interest in analyzing e-cigarette aerosols. Most studies to date have used standardized but time-consuming offline technologies. Here a proof-of-concept for a fast online quantification setup based on proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) is presented.

methodsThe combination of a novel sampling interface with a time-of-flight PTR-MS instrument specially designed for three scenarios is introduced: (i) mainstream aerosol analysis (aerosol that the user inhales prior to exhalation), and analysis of exhaled breath following (ii) mouth-hold (no inhalation) and (iii) inhalation of e-cigarette aerosols. A double-stage dilution setup allows the various concentration ranges in these scenarios to be accessed.

resultsFirst, the instrument is calibrated for the three principal constituents of the e-cigarettes' liquids, namely propylene glycol, vegetable glycerol and nicotine. With the double-stage dilution the instrument's dynamic range was easily adapted to cover the concentration ranges obtained in the three scenarios: 20-1100 ppmv for the mainstream aerosol characterisation; 4-300 ppmv for the mouth-hold; and 2 ppbv to 20 ppmv for the inhalation experiment.

conclusionsIt is demonstrated that the novel setup enables fast, high time resolution e-cigarette studies with online quantification. This enables the analysis and understanding of any puff-by-puff variations in e-cigarette aerosols. Large-scale studies involving a high number of volunteers will benefit from considerably higher sample throughput and shorter data processing times.

Identifiers

PMID26864521
PMCPMC4755144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.