Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26864260›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2016

Defining a stem cell hierarchy in the intestine: markers, caveats and controversies.

Nicholas R Smith, Alexandra C Gallagher, Melissa H Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Detailed survey of aniScience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Role of microencapsulatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Wnt Signaling and Aging of the Gastrointestinal Tract.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Intestinal renewal across the animal kingdom: comparing stem cell activity in mouse and Drosophila.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Advancing Intestinal Organoid Technology Toward Regenerative Medicine.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas R SmithDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Alexandra C GallagherDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Melissa H WongDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.

Funding

Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Coordinating CenterU01DK085532 · NIDDK · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2009 to 2018
$6.5M
Training in the Molecular Basis of Skin/Mucosa PathobiologyT32CA106195 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KULESZ-MARTIN, MOLLY F. · 2004 to 2018
$3.8M
Limited Competition for the Continuation of the Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Coordinating CenterU24DK085532 · NIDDK · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
Characterization of intestinal stem cells (research project)U01DK085525 · NIDDK · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, MELISSA H. · 2009 to 2014
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA106195NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085525NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085532NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK085532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has appreciated rapid advance in identifying the once elusive intestinal stem cell (ISC) populations that fuel the continual renewal of the epithelial layer. This advance was largely driven by identification of novel stem cell marker genes, revealing the existence of quiescent, slowly- and active-cycling ISC populations. However, a critical barrier for translating this knowledge to human health and disease remains elucidating the functional interplay between diverse stem cell populations. Currently, the precise hierarchical and regulatory relationships between these ISC populations are under intense scrutiny. The classical theory of a linear hierarchy, where quiescent and slowly-cycling stem cells self-renew but replenish an active-cycling population, is well established in other rapidly renewing tissues such as the haematopoietic system. Efforts to definitively establish a similar stem cell hierarchy within the intestinal epithelium have yielded conflicting results, been difficult to interpret, and suggest non-conventional alternatives to a linear hierarchy. While these new and potentially paradigm-shifting discoveries are intriguing, the field will require development of a number of critical tools, including highly specific stem cell marker genes along with more rigorous experimental methodologies, to delineate the complex cellular relationships within this dynamic organ system.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansIntestinesStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID26864260
PMCPMC5009783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.