Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26864118›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2016

Patient satisfaction with a teleradiology service in general practice.

Jac J W M Jacobs, Rianne Ekkelboom, Jan P A M Jacobs, Thys van der Molen, Robbert Sanderman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Empirical Foundations of Teleradiology and Related Applications: A Review of the Evidence.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jac J W M JacobsGeneral Practice, 9162 ER Ballum, Ameland, The Netherlands. jjwmjacobs@gmail.com.
Rianne EkkelboomGeneral Practice, 9162 ER Ballum, Ameland, The Netherlands.
Jan P A M JacobsFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, 9700 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Thys van der MolenDepartment of Primary Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Robbert SandermanHealth Psychology Section, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccessibility to secondary health services is not always easy for patients who live at a great distance of hospital. In these circumstances, transferring diagnostic tools and treatment options to primary care could prove beneficial for patients. To do so, the quality of medical care and the costs and benefits of the approach need to be assessed. However, the patient perspective is equally important, offering important insights.

methodsIn a cross-sectional study we investigate the satisfaction of patients toward a new teleradiology facility offered a general practice on Ameland, an island in the Netherlands. A questionnaire was created based on the Dutch version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III and completed by all patients after receiving an x-ray in primary care between June 1, 2007 and June 1, 2009. Those who received more than one x-ray in that period were included only once. The technical and interpersonal skills of doctors were rated out the sum score of the questionnaire namely 25 and 30, respectively. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the differences between the means of the satisfaction subscales and the patient characteristics.

resultsThe response proportion was after reminder 65% (381/587 patients). Satisfaction with the technical skills of the doctor providing the teleradiology service was 22.4 ± 3.7, while satisfaction with the interpersonal skills of the doctor during the diagnostic phase was 26.8 ± 3.8. Island residents, the elderly, and those with no history of trauma were more satisfied with the technical and interpersonal aspects of the consultation than non-residents, younger patients, and those with a history of trauma.

conclusionPatients in the island community of Ameland experienced high levels of satisfaction with the teleradiology service offered in primary care.

Indexed as

General PracticePatient SatisfactionTeleradiologyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26864118
PMCPMC4748486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.