Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26864088›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2016

On the assessment of spatial resolution of PET systems with iterative image reconstruction.

Kuang Gong, Simon R Cherry, Jinyi Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sub-0.5-mm Resolution PET Versus Autoradiography: Comparison of mGluR1 Concentrations in Mouse Brain.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Performance Evaluation of SmartBrain: A Wearable PET System for Human Brain Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Time-of-Flight Requirements to Mitigate Blurring Induced by Annihilation Photon Acollinearity.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Impact of detector parameters and image resolution modeling on dedicated brain PET imaging.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development and Initial Evaluation of 3D-printed High Resolution Brain Phantom for PET.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. On the partial volume effect in magnetic particle imaging.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Performance Characteristics of the NeuroEXPLORER, a Next-Generation Human Brain PET/CT Imager.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Submillimeter-Resolution PET for High-Sensitivity Mouse Brain Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kuang GongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Simon R CherryDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Jinyi QiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

Funding

National Institute on Aging (NIA) ColonyP51OD011107 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Simon J. Atkinson · 2012 to 2026
$191.5M
Optimization of PET ImagingR01EB000194 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI QI, JINYI · 2003 to 2018
$3.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000194NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB000194NIH HHS P51 OD011107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial resolution is an important metric for performance characterization in PET systems. Measuring spatial resolution is straightforward with a linear reconstruction algorithm, such as filtered backprojection, and can be performed by reconstructing a point source scan and calculating the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) along the principal directions. With the widespread adoption of iterative reconstruction methods, it is desirable to quantify the spatial resolution using an iterative reconstruction algorithm. However, the task can be difficult because the reconstruction algorithms are nonlinear and the non-negativity constraint can artificially enhance the apparent spatial resolution if a point source image is reconstructed without any background. Thus, it was recommended that a background should be added to the point source data before reconstruction for resolution measurement. However, there has been no detailed study on the effect of the point source contrast on the measured spatial resolution. Here we use point source scans from a preclinical PET scanner to investigate the relationship between measured spatial resolution and the point source contrast. We also evaluate whether the reconstruction of an isolated point source is predictive of the ability of the system to resolve two adjacent point sources. Our results indicate that when the point source contrast is below a certain threshold, the measured FWHM remains stable. Once the contrast is above the threshold, the measured FWHM monotonically decreases with increasing point source contrast. In addition, the measured FWHM also monotonically decreases with iteration number for maximum likelihood estimate. Therefore, when measuring system resolution with an iterative reconstruction algorithm, we recommend using a low-contrast point source and a fixed number of iterations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, StatisticalPhantoms, ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLikelihood FunctionsPositron-Emission Tomography

Identifiers

PMID26864088
PMCPMC4890626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.