Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26864085›Full record

ArticleAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration

The ALSFRS as an outcome measure in therapeutic trials and its relationship to symptom onset.

Malcolm Proudfoot, Ashley Jones, Kevin Talbot, Ammar Al-Chalabi, Martin R Turner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. A Phase 1 study of GDC-0134, a dual leucine zipper kinase inhibitor, in ALS.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Antisense oligonucleotide depletion ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Malcolm Proudfoota Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience , University of Oxford and.
Ashley Jonesb Department of Clinical Neuroscience , Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London , London SE5 8AF , UK.
Kevin Talbota Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience , University of Oxford and.
Ammar Al-Chalabib Department of Clinical Neuroscience , Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London , London SE5 8AF , UK.
Martin R Turnera Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience , University of Oxford and.
University of Oxford · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K000780/1Medical Research Council MR/K01014X/1Medical Research Council MR/L501529/1Motor Neurone Disease Association ALCHALABI-TALBOT/APR14/926-794Motor Neurone Disease Association TURNER/JAN13/944-795Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reduction in ALS Functional Rating Score (ALSFRS) from reported symptom onset to diagnosis is used to estimate rate of disease progression. ALSFRS decline may be non-linear or distorted by drop-outs in therapeutic trials, reducing the reliability of change in slope as an outcome measure. The PRO-ACT database uniquely allows such measures to be explored using historical data from negative therapeutic trials. The decline of functional scores was analysed in 18 pooled trials, comparing rates of decline based on symptom onset with rates calculated between interval assessments. Strategies to mitigate the effects of trial drop-out were considered. Results showed that progression rate calculated by symptom onset underestimated the subsequent rate of disability accumulation, although it predicted survival more accurately than four-month interval estimates of δALSFRS or δFVC. Individual ALSFRS and FVC progression within a typical trial duration were linear. No simple solution to correct for trial drop-out was identified, but imputation using δALSFRS appeared least disruptive. In conclusion, there is a trade-off between the drive to recruit trial participants soon after symptom onset, and reduced reliability of the ALSFRS-derived progression rate at enrolment. The need for objective markers of disease activity as an alternative to survival-based end-points is clear and pressing.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationSeverity of Illness IndexAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsTime Factorsclinical trialmodellingMotor neuron diseaseprognosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID26864085
PMCPMC4950444
OpenAlexW2282839148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.