ArticleBMC systems biology2016
Integrative modeling of multi-omics data to identify cancer drivers and infer patient-specific gene activity.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Data to Cure: A Comprehensive Exploration of Multi-omics Data Analysis for Targeted Therapies.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Review
- Review
- Molecular subtyping in colorectal cancer: A bridge to personalized therapy (Review).Oncology letters · 2023Review
- Monitoring and modelling the dynamics of the cellular glycolysis pathway: A review and future perspectives.Molecular metabolism · 2022Review
- Medulloblastoma cerebrospinal fluid reveals metabolites and lipids indicative of hypoxia and cancer-specific RNAs.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2022Article
- Synthetic biomarkers: a twenty-first century path to early cancer detection.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2021Review
- GMIEC: a shiny application for the identification of gene-targeted drugs for precision medicine.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Editorial: Artificial Intelligence Bioinformatics: Development and Application of Tools for Omics and Inter-Omics Studies.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- A robust fuzzy rule based integrative feature selection strategy for gene expression data in TCGA.BMC medical genomics · 2019Article
- Network-based logistic regression integration method for biomarker identification.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- integRATE: a desirability-based data integration framework for the prioritization of candidate genes across heterogeneous omics and its application to preterm birth.BMC medical genomics · 2018Article
- Immunohistochemical WWOX Expression and Association with Angiogenesis, p53 Expression, Cell Proliferation and Clinicopathological Parameters in Cervical Cancer.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2018Article
- Review of Statistical Learning Methods in Integrated Omics Studies (An Integrated Information Science).Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2018Review
- Genetic load makes cancer cells more sensitive to common drugs: evidence from Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- In silico Pathway Activation Network Decomposition Analysis (iPANDA) as a method for biomarker development.Nature communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh throughput technologies have been used to profile genes in multiple different dimensions, such as genetic variation, copy number, gene and protein expression, epigenetics, metabolomics. Computational analyses often treat these different data types as independent, leading to an explosion in the number of features making studies under-powered and more importantly do not provide a comprehensive view of the gene's state. We sought to infer gene activity by integrating different dimensions using biological knowledge of oncogenes and tumor suppressors.
resultsThis paper proposes an integrative model of oncogene and tumor suppressor activity in cells which is used to identify cancer drivers and compute patient-specific gene activity scores. We have developed a Fuzzy Logic Modeling (FLM) framework to incorporate biological knowledge with multi-omics data such as somatic mutation, gene expression and copy number measurements. The advantage of using a fuzzy logic approach is to abstract meaningful biological rules from low-level numerical data. Biological knowledge is often qualitative, thus combining it with quantitative numerical measurements may leverage new biological insights about a gene's state. We show that the oncogenic and altered tumor suppressing state of a gene can be better characterized by integrating different molecular measurements with biological knowledge than by each data type alone. We validate the gene activity score using data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia and drug sensitivity data for five compounds: BYL719 (PIK3CA inhibitor), PLX4720 (BRAF inhibitor), AZD6244 (MEK inhibitor), Erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor), and Nutlin-3 (MDM2 inhibitor). The integrative score improves prediction of drug sensitivity for the known drug targets of these compounds compared to each data type alone. The gene activity scores are also used to cluster colorectal cancer cell lines. Two subtypes of CRCs were found and potential cancer drivers and therapeutic targets for each of the subtypes were identified.
conclusionsWe propose a fuzzy logic based approach to infer gene activity in cancer by integrating numerical data with descriptive biological knowledge. We compute general patient-specific gene-level scores useful to determine the oncogenic or tumor suppressor status of cancer gene drivers and to cluster or classify patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.