Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26864056›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2016

Piloting a new approach in primary care to identify, assess and support carers of people with terminal illnesses: a feasibility study.

Emma Carduff, Alison Jarvis, Gill Highet, Anne Finucane, Marilyn Kendall, Nadine Harrison, Jane Greenacre, Scott A Murray

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Electronic care coordination systems for people with advanced progressive illness: a mixed-methods evaluation in Scottish primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma CarduffMarie Curie Hospice, Balornock Rd, Glasgow, G33 3US, UK. Emma.Carduff@mariecurie.org.uk.
Alison JarvisNHS Lothian, Waverley Gate, 2-4 Waterloo Place, Edinburgh, EH1 3EG, UK. Alison.Jarvis@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk.
Gill HighetNHS Lothian, New Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK. Gill.Highet@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk.
Anne FinucaneMarie Curie Hospice Edinburgh, Frogston Road West, Edinburgh, EH10 7DR, UK. Anne.Finucane@mariecurie.org.uk.
Marilyn KendallPrimary Palliative Care Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK. Marilyn.Kendall@ed.ac.uk.
Nadine HarrisonPrimary Palliative Care Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK. nharrison12@btinternet.com.
Jane GreenacreVoice of Carers Across Lothian, 8-13 Johnston Terrace, Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH1 2PW, UK. JGreenacre@vocal.org.uk.
Scott A MurrayPrimary Palliative Care Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK. Scott.Murray@ed.ac.uk.
Marie Curie Hospice · GB

Funding

Marie Curie DCMC-RF-12-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practices in the United Kingdom are encouraged to have a protocol for the identification of carers and a mechanism for social care referral. However, a minority of carers are identified and those caring for someone with a terminal illness often cope until the situation becomes overwhelming. Earlier identification could enable more timely support. The aim of this project was to model and pilot a systematic approach to identify, assess and support carers of people with supportive and palliative care needs in primary care.

methodThe intervention was modelled on the Medical Research Council complex intervention framework with a preliminary theoretical phase, which has been reported elsewhere. In this study, which lasted 12 months, four general practices were recruited. Each practice identified a 'carer liaison' person to take the lead in identifying carers, followed by assessment and support using a toolkit modelled from the earlier phase. Qualitative evaluation interviews were conducted with carers who had received the intervention and the carer liaisons and general practitioners in the pilot practices. A stakeholder event was held to disseminate and deliberate the findings.

resultsThe practices' populations ranged from 5840 to 10832 patients and across the four practices, 83 carers were identified. Thirty six carers were identified from practice registers (disease - 16; palliative care - 9; carer - 11; advanced care plan - 12), whilst 28 were identified opportunistically by practice staff at appointments or at home. Seven carers self-identified. Overall, 81 carers received the carer pack and 25 returned the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) form. Eleven carers received a follow up call from the practice to discuss support and 12 were also referred/signposted for support. Qualitative interviews suggest carers valued connection with their practices but the paperwork in the toolkit was onerous.

conclusionThis approach to identifying and supporting carers was acceptable, but success was dependent on engagement within the whole practice. Carers did not tend to self-identify, nor ask for help. Practices need to proactively identify carers using existing opportunities, resources and computer systems, and also adopt a public health approach to raise carer awareness and perceived support within their communities.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeeds AssessmentReferral and ConsultationSocial SupportAgedAged, 80 and overDementiaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLung DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPilot ProjectsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID26864056
PMCPMC4750245
OpenAlexW2268601547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.