ReviewClinical journal of gastroenterology2016
Clinical and pathophysiological issues associated with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis.
Review in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Response to the Letter by Poddighe et al. regarding our manuscript "Basophils activated via TLR signaling may contribute to pathophysiology of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis".Journal of gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Basophils activated via TLR signaling may contribute to pathophysiology of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis.Journal of gastroenterology · 2018Article
- From Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestation, and Diagnosis to Treatment: An Overview on Autoimmune Pancreatitis.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 1995, Yoshida and colleagues proposed the concept of 'autoimmune pancreatitis' (AIP). Recently, it is accepted that the existence of two subtypes of AIP-type 1, which involves immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) as the pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), and type 2, which is characterized by granulocytic epithelial lesions. Type 2 AIP is thought to be rare in Japan. In 2011, the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) for autoimmune pancreatitis was proposed. In Japan, the clinical diagnostic criteria of AIP 2011 was proposed by the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) and the Research Committee of Intractable Diseases of the Pancreas. The JPS 2011 is based on ICDC and a simplified checklist of items to diagnose type 1 AIP. Although recent progress in type 1 AIP has resolved clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and pathogenesis, many clinical and basic issues still remain unclear. Here, we provide an overview of the recent clinical and basic issues associated with type 1 AIP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.