Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26863600›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2016

Establishment of Genome-edited Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines: From Targeting to Isolation.

John D Blair, Helen S Bateup, Dirk F Hockemeyer

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New frontiers in modeling tuberous sclerosis with human stem cell-derived neurons and brain organoids.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Efficient Protocol for Single-Cell Cloning Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John D BlairDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley.
Helen S BateupDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley.
Dirk F HockemeyerDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley; hockemeyer@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Telomerase function in human tumor and stem cell biologyR01CA196884 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HOCKEMEYER, DIRK · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA196884-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-editing of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) provides a genetically controlled and clinically relevant platform from which to understand human development and investigate the pathophysiology of disease. By employing site-specific nucleases (SSNs) for genome editing, the rapid derivation of new hPSC lines harboring specific genetic alterations in an otherwise isogenic setting becomes possible. Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 are the most commonly used SSNs. All of these nucleases function by introducing a double stranded DNA break at a specified site, thereby promoting precise gene editing at a genomic locus. SSN-meditated genome editing exploits two of the cell's endogenous DNA repair mechanisms, non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homology directed repair (HDR), to either introduce insertion/deletion mutations or alter the genome using a homologous repair template at the site of the double stranded break. Electroporation of hPSCs is an efficient means of transfecting SSNs and repair templates that incorporate transgenes such as fluorescent reporters and antibiotic resistance cassettes. After electroporation, it is possible to isolate only those hPSCs that incorporated the repair construct by selecting for antibiotic resistance. Mechanically separating hPSC colonies and confirming proper integration at the target site through genotyping allows for the isolation of correctly targeted and genetically homogeneous cell lines. The validity of this protocol is demonstrated here by using all three SSN platforms to incorporate EGFP and a puromycin resistance construct into the AAVS1 safe harbor locus in human pluripotent stem cells.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanTransgenesCell LineDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairDNA RepairElectroporationEndonucleasesGenotypeHumansPluripotent Stem CellsZinc FingersEndonucleases

Identifiers

PMID26863600
PMCPMC4781717
OpenAlexW2273244029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.