Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26863462›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2015

Racial Differences in Satisfaction with VA Health Care: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Susan L Zickmund, Kelly H Burkitt, Shasha Gao, Roslyn A Stone, Keri L Rodriguez, Galen E Switzer, Judy A Shea, Nichole K Bayliss, Rebecca Meiksin, Mary B Walsh and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Navigating Mixed-Neurotype Dialogue: Environmental and Affective Influences on Autistic Speakers.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan L ZickmundVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, University Drive (151C), Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA. Susan.Zickmund@va.gov.
Kelly H BurkittVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, University Drive (151C), Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.
Shasha GaoVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, University Drive (151C), Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.
Roslyn A StoneVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, University Drive (151C), Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.
Keri L RodriguezVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, University Drive (151C), Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.
Galen E SwitzerVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, University Drive (151C), Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.
Judy A SheaPhiladelphia VA Medical Center, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Nichole K BaylissVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, University Drive (151C), Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.
Rebecca MeiksinGender Violence and Health Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England.
Mary B WalshVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, University Drive (151C), Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.
Michael J FineVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, University Drive (151C), Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USChatham University · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs satisfied patients are more adherent and play a more active role in their own care, a better understanding of factors associated with patient satisfaction is important. PURPOSE: In response to a United States Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital Report Card that revealed lower levels of satisfaction with health care for African Americans compared to Whites, we conducted a mixed methods pilot study to obtain preliminary qualitative and quantitative information about possible underlying reasons for these racial differences.

methodsWe conducted telephone interviews with 30 African American and 31 White veterans with recent inpatient and/or outpatient health care visits at three urban VA Medical Centers. We coded the qualitative interviews in terms of identified themes within defined domains. We summarized racial differences using ordinal logistic regression for Likert scale outcomes and used random effects logistic regression to assess racial differences at the domain level.

resultsCompared to Whites, African Americans were younger (p < 0.001) and better educated (p = 0.04). Qualitatively, African Americans reported less satisfaction with trust/confidence in their VA providers and healthcare system and less satisfaction with patient-provider communication. Quantitatively, African Americans reported less satisfaction with outpatient care (odds ratio = 0.28; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.82), but not inpatient care. At the domain level, African Americans were significantly less likely than Whites to express satisfaction themes in the domain of trust/confidence (odds ratio = 0.36; 95 % CI 0.18-0.73).

conclusionThe current pilot study demonstrates racial differences in satisfaction with outpatient care and identifies some specific sources of dissatisfaction. Future research will include a large national cohort, including Hispanic veterans, in order to gain further insight into the sources of racial and ethnic differences in satisfaction with VA care and inform future interventions.

Indexed as

United States Department of Veterans AffairsAgedAmbulatory CareBlack or African AmericanFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchTrustUnited StatesVeteransWhite PeopleAccessHealth equityPatient satisfactionProvider-patient communicationRacial disparitiesTrust

Identifiers

PMID26863462
OpenAlexW2032528236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.