Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26863152›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT2016

Development and Delivery of a Physical Activity Intervention for People With Huntington Disease: Facilitating Translation to Clinical Practice.

Lori Quinn, Rob Trubey, Nina Gobat, Helen Dawes, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Carys Jones, Julia Townson, Cheney Drew, Mark Kelson, Vincent Poile and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lori QuinnSchool of Healthcare Sciences (L.Q., M.B.), Schools of Medicine and Biosciences (A.R.), and South East Wales Trials Unit (R.T., J.T., C.D., M.K., V.P., K.H.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Department of Biobehavioral Sciences (L.Q.), Teachers College, Columbia University, New York; Wales School of Primary Care Research (N.G.), Cochrane Institute of Primary Care Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Department of Sport and Health Sciences (H.D.), Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom; and Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (R.T.E., C.J.), Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.
Rob Trubey
Nina Gobat
Helen Dawes
Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Carys Jones
Julia Townson
Cheney Drew
Mark Kelson
Vincent Poile
Anne Rosser
Kerenza Hood
Monica Busse

Funding

HCRW_ NIHR-FS-2012Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWe studied the development and delivery of a 14-week complex physical activity intervention for people with Huntington disease, where detailed information about the intervention was fully embedded in the trial design process.

methodsIntervention Development: The intervention was developed through a series of focus groups. The findings from the focus groups informed the development of a logic model for the physical activity intervention that was broadly consistent with the framework of self-determination theory. Intervention Delivery: Key components underpinning the delivery of the intervention were implemented including a defined coach training program and intervention fidelity assessment methods. Training of coaches (physical therapists, occupational therapists, research nurses, and exercise trainers) was delivered via group and 1:1 training sessions using a detailed coach's manual, and with ongoing support via video calls, and e-mail communication as needed. Detailed documentation was provided to determine costs of intervention development and coach training.

resultsIntervention delivery coaches at 8 sites across the United Kingdom participated in the face-to-face training. Self-report checklists completed by each of the coaches indicated that all components of the intervention were delivered in accordance with the protocol. Mean (standard deviation) intervention fidelity scores (n = 15), as measured using a purpose-developed rating scale, was 11 (2.4) (out of 16 possible points). Coaches' perceptions of intervention fidelity were similarly high. The total cost of developing the intervention and providing training was £30,773 ($47,042 USD). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsAn important consideration in promoting translation of clinical research into practice is the ability to convey the detailed components of how the intervention was delivered to facilitate replication if the results are favorable. This report presents an illustrative example of a physical activity intervention, including the development and the training required to deliver it. This approach has the potential to facilitate reproducibility, evidence synthesis, and implementation in clinical practice.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A122).

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyHumansHuntington DiseasePhysical TherapistsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26863152
PMCPMC4795097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.