Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26863123›Full record

ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2016

Peptidomic Analysis of Rat Plasma: Proteolysis in Hemorrhagic Shock.

Federico Aletti, Elisa Maffioli, Armando Negri, Marco H Santamaria, Frank A DeLano, Erik B Kistler, Geert W Schmid-Schönbein, Gabriella Tedeschi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Preliminary profiling of blood transcriptome in a rat model of hemorrhagic shock.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  14. What's New in Shock, May 2016?Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Federico Aletti*Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy †Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California ‡Fondazione Filarete §Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy ||Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.
Elisa Maffioli
Armando Negri
Marco H Santamaria
Frank A DeLano
Erik B Kistler
Geert W Schmid-Schönbein
Gabriella Tedeschi
European Union · BE

Funding

Digestive Enzymes and Microvascular Inflammation in ShockR01GM085072 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SCHMID-SCHOENBEIN, GEERT W. · 2009 to 2017
$2.2M
The Role of Intestinal Digestive Enzymes in Circulatory ShockIK2BX001277 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI KISTLER, ERIK · 2012 to 2016
–
BLRD VA IK2 BX001277NIGMS NIH HHS GM 85072NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been previously shown that intestinal proteases translocate into the circulation during hemorrhagic shock and contribute to proteolysis in distal organs. However, consequences of this phenomenon have not previously been investigated using high-throughput approaches. Here, a shotgun label-free quantitative proteomic approach was utilized to compare the peptidome of plasma samples from healthy and hemorrhagic shock rats to verify the possible role of uncontrolled proteolytic activity in shock. Plasma was collected from rats after hemorrhagic shock (HS) consisting of 2-h hypovolemia followed by 2-h reperfusion, and from healthy control (CTRL) rats. A new two-step enrichment method was applied to selectively extract peptides and low molecular weight proteins from plasma, and directly analyze these samples by tandem mass spectrometry. One hundred twenty-six circulating peptides were identified in CTRL and 295 in HS animals. Ninety-six peptides were present in both conditions; of these, 57 increased and 30 decreased in shock. In total, 256 peptides were increased or present only in HS confirming a general increase in proteolytic activity in shock. Analysis of the proteases that potentially generated the identified peptides suggests that the larger relative contribution to the proteolytic activity in shock is due to chymotryptic-like proteases. These results provide quantitative confirmation that extensive, system-wide proteolysis is part of the complex pathologic phenomena occurring in hemorrhagic shock.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatography, LiquidMaleProteolysisProteomicsRatsRats, WistarShock, HemorrhagicTandem Mass Spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID26863123
PMCPMC4833562
OpenAlexW2321056371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.