Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26862780›Full record

ArticleACS nano2016

Nanomanufacturing: A Perspective.

J Alexander Liddle, Gregg M Gallatin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Structural Colors Go Active.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Direct Printing of Ultrathin Block Copolymer Film with Nano-in-Micro Pattern Structures.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J Alexander LiddleCenter for Nanoscale Science and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology , 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
Gregg M GallatinCenter for Nanoscale Science and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology , 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomanufacturing, the commercially scalable and economically sustainable mass production of nanoscale materials and devices, represents the tangible outcome of the nanotechnology revolution. In contrast to those used in nanofabrication for research purposes, nanomanufacturing processes must satisfy the additional constraints of cost, throughput, and time to market. Taking silicon integrated circuit manufacturing as a baseline, we consider the factors involved in matching processes with products, examining the characteristics and potential of top-down and bottom-up processes, and their combination. We also discuss how a careful assessment of the way in which function can be made to follow form can enable high-volume manufacturing of nanoscale structures with the desired useful, and exciting, properties.

Indexed as

lithographynanofabricationnanomanufacturingself-assembly

Identifiers

PMID26862780
PMCPMC4918223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.