ArticleMeta gene2016
Common functional polymorphism within miR-146a and miR-196a-2 as susceptibility loci for hepatocellular carcinoma: An updated meta-analysis.
Article in Meta gene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Functional gene polymorphisms and expression alteration of selected microRNAs and the risk of various gastric lesions inFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Clinical Significance and Potential Role ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Association ofBioscience reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMutations or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the gene region of microRNAs play an important role for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Extensive studies have tried to investigate the susceptibility role of miR-146a rs2819164 and miR-196a-2 rs11614913. However, these results are still inconsistent and inconclusive. We undertook a meta-analysis containing primarily Asian studies to assess the associations of the two SNPs with HCC risk.
methods19 studies including miR-146a (7170 cases and 9443 controls) and 15 studies including miR-196a-2 (6417 cases and 7627 controls) were used for meta-analysis. Odds ratios and 95% CI were calculated to assess the association in five different genetic models.
resultsFor the rs2910164 polymorphism of miR-146a, significantly increased risks for HCC were observed when all studies were pooled under two models (CG vs CC: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.21, P = 0.021; GG + CG vs CC: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.01-1.22, P = 0.035). For the rs11614913 polymorphism of miR-196a-2, significant increased risks for HCC development were observed when all studies were pooled under four models (C vs T: OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.06-1.23, P = 0.001; CC vs TT: OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.12-1.53, P = 0.001; CC + TC vs TT: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.03-1.31, P = 0.018; CC vs TC + TT: OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.00-1.30, P = 0.043).
conclusionOur results show that the two common SNPs within the miRNAs were associated with modest increased risk of HCC (OR < 1.6), especially in the Asian population. Larger population-based studies validating these results are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.