Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26862465›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2016

Challenges and Opportunities in Drug Delivery for Wound Healing.

Alexander J Whittam, Zeshaan N Maan, Dominik Duscher, Victor W Wong, Janos A Barrera, Michael Januszyk, Geoffrey C Gurtner

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microbiotherapy: an emerging adjunct for burn wound healing.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Advances in nucleic acid delivery strategies for diabetic wound therapy.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander J WhittamDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.
Zeshaan N MaanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.
Dominik DuscherDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.
Victor W WongDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions , Baltimore, Maryland.
Janos A BarreraDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.
Michael JanuszykDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.
Geoffrey C GurtnerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.
Stanford University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Reversal of Progenitor Cell Deficits in DiabetesR01DK074095 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GURTNER, GEOFFREY C · 2005 to 2025
$6.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK074095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID26862465
PMCPMC4742986
OpenAlexW2331666427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.