Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26862376›Full record

ArticleJundishapur journal of microbiology2015

Comparison of Biological and Immunological Characterization of Lipopolysaccharides From Brucella abortus RB51 and S19.

Zahra Kianmehr, Sussan Kaboudanian Ardestani, Hoorieh Soleimanjahi, Fatemeh Fotouhi, Saeed Alamian, Shahin Ahmadian

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jundishapur journal of microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Genomic Analysis of Natural RoughInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Loci Associated With Antibody Response in Feral Swine (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zahra KianmehrImmunology Lab, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, IR Iran.
Sussan Kaboudanian ArdestaniImmunology Lab, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, IR Iran.
Hoorieh SoleimanjahiDepartment of Virology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran.
Fatemeh FotouhiDepartment of Influenza, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, IR Iran.
Saeed AlamianDepartment of Brucellosis, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Karaj, IR Iran.
Shahin AhmadianDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, IR Iran.
University of Tehran · IRPasteur Institute of Iran · IRRazi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute · IRTarbiat Modares University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrucella abortus RB51 is a rough stable mutant strain, which has been widely used as a live vaccine for prevention of brucellosis in cattle instead of B. abortus strain S19. B. abortus lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has unique properties in comparison to other bacterial LPS.

objectivesIn the current study, two types of LPS, smooth (S-LPS) and rough (R-LPS) were purified from B. abortus S19 and RB51, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate biological and immunological properties of purified LPS as an immunogenical determinant. MATERIALS AND

methodsPrimarily, S19 and RB51 LPS were extracted and purified by two different modifications of the phenol water method. The final purity of LPS was determined by chemical analysis (2-keto-3-deoxyoctonate (KDO), glycan, phosphate and protein content) and different staining methods, following sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). C57BL/6 mice were immunized subcutaneously three times at biweekly intervals with the same amount of purified LPSs. The humoral immunity was evaluated by measuring specific IgG levels and also different cytokine levels, such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-4 and IL-10, were determined for assessing T-cell immune response.

resultsBiochemical analysis data and SDS-PAGE profile showed that the chemical nature of S19 LPS is different from RB51 LPS. Both S and R-LPS induce an immune response. T-cell immune response induced by both S and R-LPS had almost the same pattern whereas S19 LPS elicited humoral immunity, which was higher than RB51 LPS.

conclusionsPurified LPS can be considered as a safe adjuvant and can be used as a component in prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines targeting infectious disease, cancer and allergies.

Indexed as

AdjuvantBrucella abortusImmune SystemLipopolysaccharide

Identifiers

PMID26862376
PMCPMC4741057
OpenAlexW1943842804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.