Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26862351›Full record

ArticleMobile DNA2016

The contribution of transposable elements to size variations between four teleost genomes.

Bo Gao, Dan Shen, Songlei Xue, Cai Chen, Hengmi Cui, Chengyi Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mobile DNA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Convergent genome streamlining accompanies independent miniaturization in the world's smallest fishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Chromosome-scale genome of European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus L., 1758) and comparative genomics uncover clupeid-specific immune gene expansions.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  4. Mixed modes of satellite DNA and transposable element evolution, which shape the repetitive landscape of air-breathing catfishes (Clarias).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bo GaoInstitute of Epigenetics & Epigenomics, College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009 China.
Dan ShenInstitute of Epigenetics & Epigenomics, College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009 China.
Songlei XueInstitute of Epigenetics & Epigenomics, College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009 China.
Cai ChenInstitute of Epigenetics & Epigenomics, College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009 China.
Hengmi CuiInstitute of Epigenetics & Epigenomics, College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009 China.
Chengyi SongInstitute of Epigenetics & Epigenomics, College of Animal Science & Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeleosts are unique among vertebrates, with a wide range of haploid genome sizes in very close lineages, varying from less than 400 mega base pairs (Mb) for pufferfish to over 3000 Mb for salmon. The cause of the difference in genome size remains largely unexplained.

resultsIn this study, we reveal that the differential success of transposable elements (TEs) correlates with the variation of genome size across four representative teleost species (zebrafish, medaka, stickleback, and tetraodon). The larger genomes represent a higher diversity within each clade (superfamily) and family and a greater abundance of TEs compared with the smaller genomes; zebrafish, representing the largest genome, shows the highest diversity and abundance of TEs in its genome, followed by medaka and stickleback; while the tetraodon, representing the most compact genome, displays the lowest diversity and density of TEs in its genome. Both of Class I (retrotransposons) and Class II TEs (DNA transposons) contribute to the difference of TE accumulation of teleost genomes, however, Class II TEs are the major component of the larger teleost genomes analyzed and the most important contributors to genome size variation across teleost lineages. The hAT and Tc1/Mariner superfamilies are the major DNA transposons of all four investigated teleosts. Divergence distribution revealed contrasting proliferation dynamics both between clades of retrotransposons and between species. The TEs within the larger genomes of the zebrafish and medaka represent relatively stronger activity with an extended time period during the evolution history, in contrast with the very young activity in the smaller stickleback genome, or the very low level of activity in the tetraodon genome.

conclusionOverall, our data shows that teleosts represent contrasting profiles of mobilomes with a differential density, diversity and activity of TEs. The differences in TE accumulation, dominated by DNA transposons, explain the main size variations of genomes across the investigated teleost species, and the species differences in both diversity and activity of TEs contributed to the variations of TE accumulations across the four teleost species. TEs play major roles in teleost genome evolution.

Indexed as

ActivityDiversityGenome size evolutionTeleostsTransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID26862351
PMCPMC4746887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.