Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26862241›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2015

The Event-related Potential P300 in Patients with Migraine.

Marina Titlic, Nikolina Ivica Mise, Irena Pintaric, Veljko Rogosic, Lucija Vanjaka-Rogosic, Mario Mihalj, Pavao Jurinovic, Ana Curkovic Katic, Maja Andjelinovic

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cognitive dysfunction and migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2018
    Review
  6. P300 Wave Changes in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marina TitlicClinical Department of Neurology, Split University Hospital Center, Split, Croatia.
Nikolina Ivica MiseClinical Department of Neurology, Split University Hospital Center, Split, Croatia.
Irena PintaricClinical Department of Neurology, Split University Hospital Center, Split, Croatia.
Veljko RogosicClinical Department of Ophthalmology, Split University Hospital Center, Split, Croatia.
Lucija Vanjaka-RogosicPrivate Dermatovenerology Clinic, Split, Croatia.
Mario MihaljClinical Department of Neurology, Split University Hospital Center, Split, Croatia.
Pavao JurinovicClinical Department of Neurology, Split University Hospital Center, Split, Croatia.
Ana Curkovic KaticClinical Department of Neurology, Split University Hospital Center, Split, Croatia.
Maja AndjelinovicDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Split · HRUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecording of event-related potentials by using oddball paradigm of auditory P300 has yielded conflicting results in migraine. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that migraine patients have reduced P300 amplitude and prolonged P300 latency, suggesting alterations of the cognitive-evaluative component.

methodsWe recruited 29 migraine patients (24 females; median age 40 years) and 29 healthy age- and gender-matched participants. Participants were subjected to the same testing procedures of auditory P300 by discrimination the target auditory stimulus from the frequent stimulus, and analyzing P300 target/frequent stimulus amplitudes, and P300 target/frequent stimulus latencies.

resultsPatients with migraine don't have prolonged P300 target stimulus latency, but have a longer P300 frequent stimulus latency for 17.5ms. Out of 29 participants with migraine 8 had pathological P300 target stimulus amplitude, and 19 had pathological P300 frequent stimulus amplitude.

conclusionPeople with migraine have altered the P300 which indicates the presence of cognitive dysfunction in these patients and importance of early diagnosis and intervention to preventing any deterioration in cognitive functions.

Indexed as

cognitionevent-related potentialsmigraine disordersP300

Identifiers

PMID26862241
PMCPMC4720829
OpenAlexW2238341521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.