Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26862234›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

A Comparison of Parallel and Integrated Models for Implementation of Routine HIV Screening in a Large, Urban Emergency Department.

Abigail Hankin, Heather Freiman, Brittney Copeland, Natasha Travis, Bijal Shah

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. How to best conduct universal HIV screening in emergency departments is far from settled.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Article
  5. Unique Needs for the Implementation of Emergency Department Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening in Adolescents.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Expanding Hospital Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing in the Bronx, New York and Washington, District of Columbia: Results From the HPTN 065 Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abigail HankinEmory University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA.
Heather FreimanEmory University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA.
Brittney CopelandEmory University, Southeast AIDS Training and Education Center, Atlanta, GA.
Natasha TravisEmory University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA.
Bijal ShahEmory University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA.
Grady Health System · USEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study compared two approaches for implementation of non-targeted HIV screening in the emergency department (ED): (1) designated HIV counselors screening in parallel with ED care and (2) nurse-based screening integrated into patient triage.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed to compare parallel and integrated screening models using data from the first 12 months of each program. Data for the parallel screening model were extracted from information collected by HIV test counselors and the electronic medical record (EMR). Integrated screening model data were extracted from the EMR and supplemented by data collected by HIV social workers during patient interaction. For both programs, data included demographics, HIV test offer, test acceptance or declination, and test result. A Z-test between two proportions was performed to compare screening frequencies and results.

resultsDuring the first 12 months of parallel screening, approximately 120,000 visits were made to the ED, with 3,816 (3%) HIV tests administered and 65 (2%) new diagnoses of HIV infection. During the first 12 months of integrated screening, 111,738 patients were triaged in the ED, with 16,329 (15%) patients tested and 190 (1%) new diagnoses. Integrated screening resulted in an increased frequency of HIV screening compared with parallel screening (0.15 tests per ED patient visit vs. 0.03 tests per ED patient visit, p<0.001) and an increase in the absolute number of new diagnoses (190 vs. 65), representing a slight decrease in the proportion of new diagnoses (1% vs. 2%, p=0.007).

conclusionNon-targeted, integrated HIV screening, with test offer and order by ED nurses during patient triage, is feasible and resulted in an increased frequency of HIV screening and a threefold increase in the absolute number of newly identified HIV-positive patients.

Indexed as

AdultAIDS SerodiagnosisContinuity of Patient CareDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitals, UrbanHumansInformed ConsentMaleModels, OrganizationalRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26862234
PMCPMC4720610
OpenAlexW2463289762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.