Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26862079›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2016

Alcohol Screening and Intervention Among United States Adults who Attend Ambulatory Healthcare.

Joseph E Glass, Kipling M Bohnert, Richard L Brown

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph E GlassSchool of Social Work, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1350 University Ave., Madison, WI, 53706, USA. jglass2@wisc.edu.
Kipling M BohnertVeterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Richard L BrownDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Racial/ethnic Disparities in Alcohol Outcomes and Health ServiceR03AA023639 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GLASS, JOSEPH EDWIN · 2015 to 2016
$154k
HSRD VA IK2 HX000970NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA023639NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD009373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited data on the extent to which indicated alcohol interventions are delivered in U.S. ambulatory care settings.

objectiveTo assess the receipt of alcohol-related services, including assessment of use, advice to reduce drinking, and information about alcohol treatment, during ambulatory care visits.

designSecondary data analysis of the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of civilians in the non-institutionalized U.S. general population (response rate 71.7 %).

participantsAdult ambulatory care users in the public use data file who did not obtain emergency or inpatient services (n = 17,266). MAIN MEASURES: Measurements included respondents' alcohol consumption, heavy episodic drinking, alcohol use disorder, healthcare use, and receipt of alcohol-related interventions. KEY

resultsApproximately 71.1 % of ambulatory care users received an alcohol assessment. Among past-month heavy episodic drinkers without an alcohol use disorder who reported receiving an alcohol assessment, 4.4 % were advised to cut back. Among individuals with alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence who reported receiving an alcohol assessment, 2.9 % and 7.0 %, respectively, were offered information about treatment.

conclusionsRates of alcohol screening and assessment were relatively high among adults who attended healthcare visits, but rates of intervention were low, even when individuals were assessed for use. Efforts are needed to expand delivery of interventions when patients are identified as positive for risky drinking, hazardous alcohol use, and alcohol use disorders during ambulatory care visits.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismAmbulatory CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisRisk-TakingUnited StatesYoung Adultalcoholambulatory carereferralscreening and brief interventiontreatment

Identifiers

PMID26862079
PMCPMC4907945
OpenAlexW2258207592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.