Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26862076›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2016

Effects of co-occurring Wolbachia and Spiroplasma endosymbionts on the Drosophila immune response against insect pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria.

Upasana Shokal, Shruti Yadav, Jaishri Atri, Julia Accetta, Eric Kenney, Katherine Banks, Akash Katakam, John Jaenike, Ioannis Eleftherianos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Review
  5. The endosymbiontmBio · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Grappling with the tick microbiome.Trends in parasitology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bacterial communities withinEcology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Upasana ShokalInsect Infection and Immunity Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University, 5675 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA. upasana@gwu.edu.
Shruti YadavInsect Infection and Immunity Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University, 5675 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA. shrutiyadav@gwmail.gwu.edu.
Jaishri AtriInsect Infection and Immunity Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University, 5675 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA. jaishri@gwmail.gwu.edu.
Julia AccettaInsect Infection and Immunity Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University, 5675 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA. jlaccetta@gmail.com.
Eric KenneyInsect Infection and Immunity Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University, 5675 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA. etkenney2@email.gwu.edu.
Katherine BanksInsect Infection and Immunity Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University, 5675 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA. katiebanks@gwmail.gwu.edu.
Akash KatakamInsect Infection and Immunity Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University, 5675 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA. akatakam@gwmail.gwu.edu.
John JaenikeDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14627, USA. john.jaenike@rochester.edu.
Ioannis EleftherianosInsect Infection and Immunity Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University, 5675 Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA. ioannise@gwu.edu.
George Washington University · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Role of TGF-beta signaling in the Drosophila immune response against nematode-bacteria complexesR01AI110675 · NIAID · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ELEFTHERIANOS, IOANNIS · 2015 to 2018
$954k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymbiotic interactions between microbes and animals are common in nature. Symbiotic organisms are particularly common in insects and, in some cases, they may protect their hosts from pathogenic infections. Wolbachia and Spiroplasma endosymbionts naturally inhabit various insects including Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies. Therefore, this symbiotic association is considered an excellent model to investigate whether endosymbiotic bacteria participate in host immune processes against certain pathogens. Here we have investigated whether the presence of Wolbachia alone or together with Spiroplasma endosymbionts in D. melanogaster adult flies affects the immune response against the virulent insect pathogen Photorhabdus luminescens and against non-pathogenic Escherichia coli bacteria.

resultsWe found that D. melanogaster flies carrying no endosymbionts, those carrying both Wolbachia and Spiroplasma, and those containing Wolbachia only had similar survival rates after infection with P. luminescens or Escherichia coli bacteria. However, flies carrying both endosymbionts or Wolbachia only contained higher numbers of E. coli cells at early time-points post infection than flies without endosymbiotic bacteria. Interestingly, flies containing Wolbachia only had lower titers of this endosymbiont upon infection with the pathogen P. luminescens than uninfected flies of the same strain. We further found that the presence of Wolbachia and Spiroplasma in D. melanogaster up-regulated certain immune-related genes upon infection with P. luminescens or E. coli bacteria, but it failed to alter the phagocytic ability of the flies toward E. coli inactive bioparticles.

conclusionOur results suggest that the presence of Wolbachia and Spiroplasma in D. melanogaster can modulate immune signaling against infection by certain insect pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria. Results from such studies are important for understanding the molecular basis of the interactions between endosymbiotic bacteria of insects and exogenous microbes.

Indexed as

SymbiosisAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleMaleSpiroplasmaWolbachiaDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26862076
PMCPMC4746768
OpenAlexW2266574173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.