Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26862016›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2016

Antithrombin III for critically ill patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Mikkel Allingstrup, Jørn Wetterslev, Frederikke B Ravn, Ann Merete Møller, Arash Afshari

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A comparison of anti-coagulation monitoring tests in ICU patients receiving a continuous infusion of unfractionated heparin.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mikkel AllingstrupDepartment of Anaesthesia, Køge Sygehus, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. mikkel.allingstrup@gmail.com.
Jørn WetterslevCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frederikke B RavnDepartment of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesia, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ann Merete MøllerThe Cochrane Anaesthesia, Critical and Emergency Care Group, University of Copenhagen Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Arash AfshariDepartment of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesia, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cochrane · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAntithrombin III (AT III) is an anticoagulant with anti-inflammatory properties. We assessed the benefits and harms of AT III in critically ill patients.

methodsWe searched from inception to 27 August 2015 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CAB, BIOSIS and CINAHL. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published or language.

resultsWe included 30 RCTs with a total of 3933 participants. The majority of included trials were at high risk of bias. Combining all trials, regardless of bias, showed no statistically significant effect of AT III on mortality (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-1.03, I (2) = 0%, fixed-effect model, 29 trials, 3882 participants). Among those with severe sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), AT III showed no impact on mortality (RR 0.95, 95% Cl 0.88-1.03, I (2) = 0%, fixed-effect model, 12 trials, 2858 participants). We carried out multiple subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the benefits and harms of AT III and to examine the impact of risk of bias. AT III significantly increased bleeding events (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.35-1.84, I (2) = 0%, fixed-effect model, 11 trials, 3019 participants). However, for all other outcome measures and analyses, the results did not reach statistical significance.

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to support AT III substitution in any category of critically ill participants including those with sepsis and DIC. AT III did not show an impact on mortality, but increased the risk of bleeding.

Indexed as

Antithrombin IIIAntithrombinsCritical IllnessDisseminated Intravascular CoagulationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSepsisAntithrombin IIIAntithrombinsAntithrombin IIIBleedingDICMulti organ failureSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID26862016
PMCPMC7095103
OpenAlexW2272987617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.