Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26861942›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Dental practitioner recruitment for a randomized clinical trial in the field to evaluate the performance of a new glass ionomer restoration material.

Thomas Klinke, Amro Daboul, Christian Schwahn, Roland Frankenberger, Reinhard Hickel, Reiner Biffar

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas KlinkePoliclinic of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Greifswald University, Greifswald, Germany. klinke@uni-greifswald.de.
Amro DaboulPoliclinic of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Greifswald University, Greifswald, Germany. daboula@uni-greifswald.de.
Christian SchwahnPoliclinic of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Greifswald University, Greifswald, Germany. schwahn@uni-greifswald.de.
Roland FrankenbergerConservative Dentistry Department, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. rankbg@med.uni-marburg.de.
Reinhard HickelPoliclinic for Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. hickel@dent.med.uni-muenchen.de.
Reiner BiffarPoliclinic of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Greifswald University, Greifswald, Germany. biffar@uni-greifswald.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2009, we began recruiting dental practitioners across Germany to participate in a clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of EQUIA, a new glass ionomer restoration material. The aim of this paper is to discuss the outcomes of the dental practitioner recruitment and outline the process of establishing a practice-based research network.

methodsStudy proposals were sent to randomly selected dental offices in 29 cities in Germany. The proposals were sent until a minimum of 10 clinics in each city declared participation. Later on, briefing lectures informed the participating practitioners about the design, methods, and material application procedure. Participants were familiarized with the guidelines of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) and Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP). A questionnaire describing the characteristics of each dental office was filled out by the participating practitioner. Additionally, participation levels were characterized according to the socioeconomic status and geographic districts of residence in Germany (Regions 0 to 9). The associations between the characteristics were tested by the Kruskal-Wallis Test and Chi-squared test (P < 0.05).

resultsA total of 3194 private dental clinics were invited, 1712 clinics refused to participate, 1195 did not respond to the invitation, and 323 agreed to participate. Only 144 clinics participated in the lectures held in their cities and signed the participation agreement. Based on their geographic location, the highest participation was in Region 2 with a participation rate of 14.3%, and the lowest participation was in Region 6 with a participation rate of 1.7%. Regions with the lowest rate of unemployment and relatively higher rates of income (Regions 7 and 8) had the highest rate of refusals (86%).

conclusionThe initial results of the dental practitioner recruitment in this study suggest that the recruitment and pre-randomization design were successful, and by reaching out to a considerable number of private dental clinics to participate, we were able to recruit a smaller number of highly motivated dentists in this clinical study. Regional differences in socioeconomic status, practitioner specialization, and differences in patient health care insurance have to be considered when recruiting dental practitioners for clinical trials.

trial registrationThe trial has been registered at Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (German register of clinical trials) on 6 September 2012 under DRKS-ID: DRKS00004220.

Indexed as

Acrylic ResinsDental MaterialsDentistsPatient SelectionSilicon DioxideDouble-Blind MethodEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansProspective StudiesSocial ClassAcrylic ResinsDental Materialsglass ionomerSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID26861942
PMCPMC4748549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.