Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26861939›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Methods of a large prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point study comparing morning versus evening dosing in hypertensive patients: the Treatment In Morning versus Evening (TIME) study.

David A Rorie, Amy Rogers, Isla S Mackenzie, Ian Ford, David J Webb, Bryan Willams, Morris Brown, Neil Poulter, Evelyn Findlay, Wendy Saywood and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Advances in the Treatment Strategies in Hypertension: Present and Future.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

David A RorieUniversity of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Amy RogersUniversity of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Isla S MackenzieUniversity of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Ian FordRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
David J WebbCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Bryan WillamsNIHR UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, UCL, London, UK.
Morris BrownUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Neil PoulterImperial College London, London, UK.
Evelyn FindlayUniversity of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Wendy SaywoodUniversity of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Thomas M MacDonaldUniversity of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Ninewells Hospital · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CS/14/1/30659British Heart Foundation SP/10/6/28562Medical Research Council MC_PC_13090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNocturnal blood pressure (BP) appears to be a better predictor of cardiovascular outcome than daytime BP. The BP lowering effects of most antihypertensive therapies are often greater in the first 12 h compared to the next 12 h. The Treatment In Morning versus Evening (TIME) study aims to establish whether evening dosing is more cardioprotective than morning dosing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The TIME study uses the prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point (PROBE) design. TIME recruits participants by advertising in the community, from primary and secondary care, and from databases of consented patients in the UK. Participants must be aged over 18 years, prescribed at least one antihypertensive drug taken once a day, and have a valid email address. After the participants have self-enrolled and consented on the secure TIME website (http://www.timestudy.co.uk) they are randomised to take their antihypertensive medication in the morning or the evening. Participant follow-ups are conducted after 1 month and then every 3 months by automated email. The trial is expected to run for 5 years, randomising 10,269 participants, with average participant follow-up being 4 years. The primary end point is hospitalisation for the composite end point of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke (cerebrovascular accident; CVA) or any vascular death determined by record-linkage. Secondary end points are: each component of the primary end point, hospitalisation for non-fatal stroke, hospitalisation for non-fatal MI, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, hospitalisation or death from congestive heart failure. The primary outcome will be a comparison of time to first event comparing morning versus evening dosing using an intention-to-treat analysis. The sample size is calculated for a two-sided test to detect 20% superiority at 80% power. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: TIME has ethical approval in the UK, and results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UKCRN17071; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AdultAntihypertensive AgentsDrug Administration ScheduleFeasibility StudiesHumansHypertensionProspective StudiesResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomAntihypertensive AgentsCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYEPIDEMIOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID26861939
PMCPMC4762112
OpenAlexW2256980343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.