Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26861938›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2016

Utilisation of helicopter emergency medical services in the early medical response to major incidents: a systematic literature review.

Anne Siri Johnsen, Sabina Fattah, Stephen J M Sollid, Marius Rehn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Factors associated with a positive shock index in the prehospital setting after major trauma.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Great Belt train accident: the emergency medical services response.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Trials and tribulations: how we established a major incident database.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne Siri JohnsenDepartment of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway Department of Health Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway Department of Anaesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Sabina FattahDepartment of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Stephen J M SollidDepartment of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway Department of Health Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Marius RehnDepartment of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway Department of Health Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway London's Air Ambulance, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis systematic review identifies, describes and appraises the literature describing the utilisation of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) in the early medical response to major incidents.

settingEarly prehospital phase of a major incident.

designSystematic literature review performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cinahl, Bibsys Ask, Norart, Svemed and UpToDate were searched using phrases that combined HEMS and 'major incidents' to identify when and how HEMS was utilised. The identified studies were subjected to data extraction and appraisal.

resultsThe database search identified 4948 articles. Based on the title and abstract, the full text of 96 articles was obtained; of these, 37 articles were included in the review, and an additional five were identified by searching the reference lists of the 37 articles. HEMS was used to transport medical and rescue personnel to the incident and to transport patients to the hospital, especially when the infrastructure was damaged. Insufficient air traffic control, weather conditions, inadequate landing sites and failing communication were described as challenging in some incidents.

conclusionsHEMS was used mainly for patient treatment and to transport patients, personnel and equipment in the early medical management of major incidents, but the optimal utilisation of this specialised resource remains unclear. This review identified operational areas with improvement potential. A lack of systematic indexing, heterogeneous data reporting and weak methodological design, complicated the identification and comparison of incidents, and more systematic reporting is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42013004473.

Indexed as

AircraftDisastersEmergency Medical ServicesHumansTransportation of PatientsAir ambulancesDisastersHelicopter emergency medical servicesMajor incidentsMass casualty incidents

Identifiers

PMID26861938
PMCPMC4762099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.