Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26861870›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2016

[New oral anticoagulants for prophylaxis of stroke. Results of an expert conference on practical use in geriatric patients].

Philipp Bahrmann, Fred Harms, Christian Martin Schambeck, Martin Wehling, Jürgen Flohr

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Philipp BahrmannInstitut für Biomedizin des Alterns, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kobergerstr. 60, 90419, Nürnberg, Deutschland. philipp.bahrmann@fau.de.
Fred HarmsEuropean Health Care Foundation, Zug, Schweiz.
Christian Martin SchambeckHämostatikum, München, Deutschland.
Martin WehlingInstitut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Jürgen FlohrAllgemeinmedizinische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHealth Care Foundation · CAHeidelberg University · DEPraxis für Humangenetik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geriatric patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) are increasingly being treated with novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) to prevent ischemic stroke. This article highlights the outcome of an expert meeting on the practical use of NOAC in elderly patients. An interdisciplinary group of experts discussed the current situation of stroke prevention in geriatric patients and its practical management in daily clinical practice. The topic was examined through focused impulse presentations and critical analyses as the basis for the expert consensus. The key issues are summarized in this paper. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines from 2012 for the management of patients with non-valvular AF recommend NOAC as the preferred treatment and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) only as an alternative option. Currently, the NOAC factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran are more commonly used in clinical practice for patients with AF. Although these drugs have many similarities and are often grouped together it is important to recognize that the pharmacology and dose regimes differ between compounds. Especially n elderly patients NOAC drugs have some advantages compared to VKA, e.g. less drug-drug interactions with concomitant medication and a more favorable risk-benefit ratio mostly driven by the reduction of bleeding. Treatment of anticoagulation in geriatric patients requires weighing the serious risk of stroke against an equally high risk of major bleeding and pharmacoeconomic considerations. Geriatric patients in particular have the greatest benefit from NOAC, which can also be administered in cases of reduced renal function. Regular control of the indications is indispensable, as also for all other medications of the patient. The use of NOAC should certainly not be withheld from geriatric patients who have a clear need for oral anticoagulation.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleEvidence-Based MedicineExpert TestimonyFemaleGeriatricsHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedStrokeAnticoagulantsAdherenceInterdisciplinary managementOlder PatientsPreventionStroke

Identifiers

PMID26861870
OpenAlexW2256132446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.