Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26861691›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2016

A guide to human in vivo microcirculatory flow image analysis.

Michael J Massey, Nathan I Shapiro

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06253325 (An Observational Pilot Study for the Multi-Modality Risk Prediction and Early Identification of Critically Ill Septic Patients in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06253325 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An Observational Pilot Study for the Multi-Modality Risk Prediction and Early Identification of Critically Ill Septic Patients in the Emergency Department

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsSepsisArmsMeasuring tissue oxygenation, Procalcitonin, Mid-regional proadrenomedullin, Hand-held video microscope
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Microcirculation-guided treatment improves tissue perfusion and hemodynamic coherence in surgical patients with septic shock.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael J MasseyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. mmassey@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Nathan I ShapiroDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. nshapiro@bidmc.harvard.edu.

Funding

Endothelial Cell Signaling and Microcirculatory Flow in Severe SepsisR01HL091757 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHAPIRO, NATHAN I · 2008 to 2011
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL091757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various noninvasive microscopic camera technologies have been used to visualize the sublingual microcirculation in patients. We describe a comprehensive approach to bedside in vivo sublingual microcirculation video image capture and analysis techniques in the human clinical setting. We present a user perspective and guide suitable for clinical researchers and developers interested in the capture and analysis of sublingual microcirculatory flow videos. We review basic differences in the cameras, optics, light sources, operation, and digital image capture. We describe common techniques for image acquisition and discuss aspects of video data management, including data transfer, metadata, and database design and utilization to facilitate the image analysis pipeline. We outline image analysis techniques and reporting including video preprocessing and image quality evaluation. Finally, we propose a framework for future directions in the field of microcirculatory flow videomicroscopy acquisition and analysis. Although automated scoring systems have not been sufficiently robust for widespread clinical or research use to date, we discuss promising innovations that are driving new development.

Indexed as

Regional Blood FlowHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicrocirculationMicroscopy, Video

Identifiers

PMID26861691
PMCPMC4748457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.