Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26861472›Full record

SynthesisCurrent neuropharmacology2017

Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Morag E Brookes, Sam Eldabe, Alan Batterham

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current neuropharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-opioid Analgesics and Emerging Therapies.Cancer treatment and research · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Efficacy and safety of the CaPain reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Covalently Binding Adenosine APurinergic signalling · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Voltage-dependent CaPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Therapeutic Potential of Highly Selective AMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Neuroactive venom compounds obtained fromThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Morag E BrookesDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW, UK
Sam EldabeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW, UK
Alan BatterhamTeesside University, Borough Road, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK
James Cook University Hospital · GBTeesside University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic neuropathic pain is difficult to treat and is often refractory to most modalities of treatment. Ziconotide is a novel, potent, non-opioid, calcium channel blocking agent which has been shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating chronic neuropathic pain.

methodsEMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science electronic databases were searched for English language studies. Reference sections of articles were examined for further papers and the manufacturer of ziconotide was contacted for further unpublished data. Three randomised controlled trials in ziconotide monotherapy were included and subjected to a random effects meta-analysis.

resultsAll three studies used the similar main outcome measure (visual analogue scale of pain intensity; VASPI) and were therefore comparable. A Jadad score was performed for each paper. Frequent serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed which resulted in two of the studies revising the protocol. The metaanalysis revealed a pooled odds ratio (responders on ziconotide vs. placebo) of 2.77 (95% CI, 1.37 to 5.59). DISCUSSION: The results suggest that ziconotide is beneficial for pain reduction in chronic neuropathic pain. However, there remain some methodological issues that may call into question the validity of the results. It is evident that more work needs to be conducted to further validate the efficacy of ziconotide and to discover new areas of use.

Indexed as

Analgesics, Non-NarcoticCalcium Channel BlockersChronic PainHumansNeuralgiaomega-ConotoxinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticCalcium Channel Blockersomega-Conotoxinsziconotide

Identifiers

PMID26861472
PMCPMC5412704
OpenAlexW2270180314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.