Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26861417›Full record

Trial reportInfection control and hospital epidemiology2016

A Multicenter Pragmatic Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing in Community Hospital Intensive Care Units.

Kristen V Dicks, Eric Lofgren, Sarah S Lewis, Rebekah W Moehring, Daniel J Sexton, Deverick J Anderson

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Chlorhexidine: Patient Bathing and Infection Prevention.Current infectious disease reports · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristen V Dicks1Department of Medicine,Division of Infectious Diseases,Duke University Medical Center,Durham,North Carolina.
Eric Lofgren3Network Dynamics and Simulation Science Lab,Virginia Bioinformatics Institute,Virginia Tech,Blacksburg,Virginia.
Sarah S Lewis1Department of Medicine,Division of Infectious Diseases,Duke University Medical Center,Durham,North Carolina.
Rebekah W Moehring1Department of Medicine,Division of Infectious Diseases,Duke University Medical Center,Durham,North Carolina.
Daniel J Sexton1Department of Medicine,Division of Infectious Diseases,Duke University Medical Center,Durham,North Carolina.
Deverick J Anderson1Department of Medicine,Division of Infectious Diseases,Duke University Medical Center,Durham,North Carolina.
Duke Medical Center · USDurham VA Medical Center · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Defining Measures of Impact for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Community HospitalsK08HS023866 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOEHRING, REBEKAH WHITE · 2015 to 2019
$739k
Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in a CommuniK23AI095357 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, DEVERICK JOHN · 2011 to 2015
$644k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS023866NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI095357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine whether daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing of intensive care unit (ICU) patients leads to a decrease in hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), particularly infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). DESIGN Interrupted time series analysis. SETTING The study included 33 community hospitals participating in the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network from January 2008 through December 2013. PARTICIPANTS All ICU patients at study hospitals during the study period. METHODS Of the 33 hospitals, 17 hospitals implemented CHG bathing during the study period, and 16 hospitals that did not perform CHG bathing served as controls. Primary pre-specified outcomes included ICU central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), primary bloodstream infections (BSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). MRSA and VRE HAIs were also evaluated. RESULTS Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing was associated with a significant downward trend in incidence rates of ICU CLABSI (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.99), ICU primary BSI (IRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), VRE CLABSIs (IRR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.97-0.98), and all combined VRE infections (IRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-1.00). No significant trend in MRSA infection incidence rates was identified prior to or following the implementation of CHG bathing. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter, real-world analysis of the impact of CHG bathing, hospitals that implemented CHG bathing attained a decrease in ICU CLABSIs, ICU primary BSIs, and VRE CLABSIs. CHG bathing did not affect rates of specific or overall infections due to MRSA. Our findings support daily CHG bathing of ICU patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:791-797.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalCatheter-Related InfectionsChlorhexidineCross InfectionHospitals, CommunityHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedStaphylococcal InfectionsVancomycin-Resistant EnterococciAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconate

Identifiers

PMID26861417
PMCPMC5894096
OpenAlexW2409575133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.