Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26861346›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Application of 2D Non-Graphene Materials and 2D Oxide Nanostructures for Biosensing Technology.

Kateryna Shavanova, Yulia Bakakina, Inna Burkova, Ivan Shtepliuk, Roman Viter, Arnolds Ubelis, Valerio Beni, Nickolaj Starodub, Rositsa Yakimova, Volodymyr Khranovskyy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Au- and Pd-Doped SnSACS omega · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kateryna ShavanovaNational University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev 03041, Ukraine. shavanova@gmail.com.
Yulia BakakinaInstitute of Biophysics and Cell Engineering of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk 220072, Belarus. bakakinay@mail.ru.
Inna BurkovaNational University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev 03041, Ukraine. inna.burkova@ukr.net.
Ivan ShtepliukDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM) Linköping University, Linköping 58183, Sweden. ivan.shtepliuk@liu.se.
Roman ViterUniversity of Latvia, 19, Raina blvd., Riga 1586, Latvia.
Arnolds UbelisUniversity of Latvia, 19, Raina blvd., Riga 1586, Latvia.
Valerio BeniBiosensors and Bioelectronics Centre, Linköping University, Linköping 58183, Sweden.
Nickolaj StarodubNational University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev 03041, Ukraine. nikstarodub@yahoo.com.
Rositsa YakimovaDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM) Linköping University, Linköping 58183, Sweden. roy@ifm.liu.se.
Volodymyr KhranovskyyDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM) Linköping University, Linköping 58183, Sweden. volkh@ifm.liu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of graphene and its unique properties has inspired researchers to try to invent other two-dimensional (2D) materials. After considerable research effort, a distinct "beyond graphene" domain has been established, comprising the library of non-graphene 2D materials. It is significant that some 2D non-graphene materials possess solid advantages over their predecessor, such as having a direct band gap, and therefore are highly promising for a number of applications. These applications are not limited to nano- and opto-electronics, but have a strong potential in biosensing technologies, as one example. However, since most of the 2D non-graphene materials have been newly discovered, most of the research efforts are concentrated on material synthesis and the investigation of the properties of the material. Applications of 2D non-graphene materials are still at the embryonic stage, and the integration of 2D non-graphene materials into devices is scarcely reported. However, in recent years, numerous reports have blossomed about 2D material-based biosensors, evidencing the growing potential of 2D non-graphene materials for biosensing applications. This review highlights the recent progress in research on the potential of using 2D non-graphene materials and similar oxide nanostructures for different types of biosensors (optical and electrochemical). A wide range of biological targets, such as glucose, dopamine, cortisol, DNA, IgG, bisphenol, ascorbic acid, cytochrome and estradiol, has been reported to be successfully detected by biosensors with transducers made of 2D non-graphene materials.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesDNADopamineGlucoseGraphiteNanostructuresOxidesDNADopamineGlucoseGraphiteOxidesbeyond graphenebiosensorstransducerstransition metal dichalcogenidestransition metal oxidestwo-dimensional materialstwo-dimensional oxides

Identifiers

PMID26861346
PMCPMC4801599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.