Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26861326›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Investigation of Interference Models for RFID Systems.

Linchao Zhang, Renato Ferrero, Filippo Gandino, Maurizio Rebaudengo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linchao ZhangChina Academy of Electronics and Information Technology, Shuangyuan Road 11, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100041, China. hune213@163.com.
Renato FerreroDipartimento di Automatica e Informatica, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, Torino 10129, Italy. renato.ferrero@polito.it.
Filippo GandinoDipartimento di Automatica e Informatica, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, Torino 10129, Italy. filippo.gandino@polito.it.
Maurizio RebaudengoDipartimento di Automatica e Informatica, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, Torino 10129, Italy. maurizio.rebaudengo@polito.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reader-to-reader collision in an RFID system is a challenging problem for communications technology. In order to model the interference between RFID readers, different interference models have been proposed, mainly based on two approaches: single and additive interference. The former only considers the interference from one reader within a certain range, whereas the latter takes into account the sum of all of the simultaneous interferences in order to emulate a more realistic behavior. Although the difference between the two approaches has been theoretically analyzed in previous research, their effects on the estimated performance of the reader-to-reader anti-collision protocols have not yet been investigated. In this paper, the influence of the interference model on the anti-collision protocols is studied by simulating a representative state-of-the-art protocol. The results presented in this paper highlight that the use of additive models, although more computationally intensive, is mandatory to improve the performance of anti-collision protocols.

Indexed as

interference modelreader-to-reader collisionRFID

Identifiers

PMID26861326
PMCPMC4801576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.