ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2016
Incidental findings in population imaging revisited.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Risk of Cardiovascular Disease With Co-Occurring Covert Brain Infarction and Unrecognized Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Predicting age of onset and progression of disease in late-onset genetic neurodegenerative diseases: An ethics review and research agenda.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Review
- Brain imaging with portable low-field MRI.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023Article
- The prevalence of incidental findings on pelvis MRI of 8-13-year-old children.Pediatric research · 2023Article
- Long-Term Psychosocial Consequences of Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Reporting of Incidental Findings in a Population-Based Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ethical Implications of Alzheimer's Disease Prediction in Asymptomatic Individuals through Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Impact of Incidental Findings Detected During Brain Imaging on Research Participants of the Rotterdam Study: An Interview Study.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2020Article
- The Rotterdam Study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results.European journal of epidemiology · 2017Article
- Ethical framework for the detection, management and communication of incidental findings in imaging studies, building on an interview study of researchers' practices and perspectives.BMC medical ethics · 2017Article
- Impact of detecting potentially serious incidental findings during multi-modal imaging.Wellcome open research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.