Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26861117›Full record

SynthesisInfection control and hospital epidemiology2016

Assessment of Fidelity in Interventions to Improve Hand Hygiene of Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review.

Jackson S Musuuza, Anna Barker, Caitlyn Ngam, Lia Vellardita, Nasia Safdar

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating the Rapid Emergence of Daptomycin Resistance inJournal of clinical microbiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jackson S Musuuza1Institute of Clinical and Translational Research,University of Wisconsin,Madison,Wisconsin.
Anna Barker2University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health,Madison,Wisconsin.
Caitlyn Ngam2University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health,Madison,Wisconsin.
Lia Vellardita3Health Sciences Library,University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health,Madison,Wisconsin.
Nasia Safdar4Department of Medicine,University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health;Department of Infectious Disease,University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics,Madison,Wisconsin.

Funding

INTEGRATED TRAINING FOR PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTST32GM008692 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURKARD, MARK E · 1998 to 2020
$10.3M
Implementation of Chlorhexidine Bathing to Reduce Healthcare-Associated Infections-the Icare studyR18HS024039 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SAFDAR, NASIA · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS024039AHRQ HHS R18HS024039NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCompliance with hand hygiene in healthcare workers is fundamental to infection prevention yet remains a challenge to sustain. We examined fidelity reporting in interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance, and we assessed 5 measures of intervention fidelity: (1) adherence, (2) exposure or dose, (3) quality of intervention delivery, (4) participant responsiveness, and (5) program differentiation.

designSystematic review

methodsA librarian performed searches of the literature in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, and Web of Science of material published prior to June 19, 2015. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, and assessment of study quality was conducted for each study reviewed.

resultsA total of 100 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only 8 of these 100 studies reported all 5 measures of intervention fidelity. In addition, 39 of 100 (39%) failed to include at least 3 fidelity measures; 20 of 100 (20%) failed to include 4 measures; 17 of 100 (17%) failed to include 2 measures, while 16 of 100 (16%) of the studies failed to include at least 1 measure of fidelity. Participant responsiveness and adherence to the intervention were the most frequently unreported fidelity measures, while quality of the delivery was the most frequently reported measure.

conclusionsAlmost all hand hygiene intervention studies failed to report at least 1 fidelity measurement. To facilitate replication and effective implementation, reporting fidelity should be standard practice when describing results of complex behavioral interventions such as hand hygiene.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelCross InfectionHand HygieneHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-PatientRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26861117
PMCPMC4853201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.