Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26860980›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Impact of different cell penetrating peptides on the efficacy of antisense therapeutics for targeting intracellular pathogens.

Mostafa F N Abushahba, Haroon Mohammad, Shankar Thangamani, Asmaa A A Hussein, Mohamed N Seleem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mostafa F N AbushahbaDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 47907.
Haroon MohammadDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 47907.
Shankar ThangamaniDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 47907.
Asmaa A A HusseinDepartment of Animal Hygiene and Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Mohamed N SeleemDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 47907.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USAssiut University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a pressing need for novel and innovative therapeutic strategies to address infections caused by intracellular pathogens. Peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) present a novel method to target intracellular pathogens due to their unique mechanism of action and their ability to be conjugated to cell penetrating peptides (CPP) to overcome challenging delivery barriers. In this study, we targeted the RNA polymerase α subunit (rpoA) using a PNA that was covalently conjugated to five different CPPs. Changing the conjugated CPP resulted in a pronounced improvement in the antibacterial activity observed against Listeria monocytogenes in vitro, in cell culture, and in a Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) infection model. Additionally, a time-kill assay revealed three conjugated CPPs rapidly kill Listeria within 20 minutes without disrupting the bacterial cell membrane. Moreover, rpoA gene silencing resulted in suppression of its message as well as reduced expression of other critical virulence genes (Listeriolysin O, and two phospholipases plcA and plcB) in a concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, PNA-inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis was selective and did not adversely affect mitochondrial protein synthesis. This study provides a foundation for improving and developing PNAs conjugated to CPPs to better target intracellular pathogens.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCaenorhabditis elegansCell-Penetrating PeptidesDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesListeria monocytogenesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOligonucleotides, AntisensePeptide Nucleic AcidsVirulenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCell-Penetrating PeptidesDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesOligonucleotides, AntisensePeptide Nucleic AcidsRNA polymerase alpha subunit

Identifiers

PMID26860980
PMCPMC4748415
OpenAlexW2412131977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.