Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26860917›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2016

An Automatic 3-D Reconstruction of Coronary Arteries by Stereopsis.

Mufit Cetin, Ali Iskurt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mufit CetinYalova University, Yalova, Turkey. mufit.cetin@yalova.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7950-5252
Ali IskurtYalova University, Yalova, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereopsis of X-ray images can produce 3D tree of coronary arteries up to a certain accuracy level with a lower dose of radiation when compared to computer tomography (CT). In this study, a novel and complete automatic system is designed that covers preprocessing, segmentation, matching and reconstruction steps for that purpose. First, an automatic and novel pattern recognition technique is applied for extraction of the bifurcation points with their diameters recorded in a map. Then, a novel optimization algorithm is run for matching the branches efficiently which is based on that map and the epipolar geometry of stereopsis. Finally, cut branches are fixed one by one at the bifurcations for completing the 3D reconstruction. This method prevails the similar ones in the literature with this novelty since it automatically and inherently prevents the wrong overlapping of branches. Other essential problems like correct detection of the bifurcations and accurate calibration parameters and fast overlapping of matched branches are addressed at acceptable levels. The accuracy of bifurcation extraction is high at 90 % with 96 % sensitivity. Accuracy of vessel centerlines has rootmean-square (rms) error smaller than 0.57 mm for 20 different patients. For phantom model, rms error is 0.75 ± 0.8 mm in 3D localization.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCoronary VesselsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, TheoreticalPattern Recognition, AutomatedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutomaticityBifurcationCoronary arteryMedical imagingStereopsis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.